Tzar

I know I am way off topic here but --Falling Water-- I think you might have the wrong idea about what architecture can be for a person. For one I wouldn't think of architecture as "practical"-- Instead architecture for me, at its heart, has nothing to do with practicality, but instead how something is its conception. For instance if one thinks of a bedroom then one must be true to what that room is trying to be-- as in it should be able to have a place for a person to rest and it should have enough room so that person feels comfortable in that room and can relax, but that isn’t really about practicality- That is about what you as an architect are trying to create. It is my understanding there are requirements only in relation to the responsibility of what and architect must provide- but that seems much farther away from what you are describing as “practicality”