| Which candidate states a reasoned and honorable position, and which candidates adopt a phony position to pander to what they perceive as the voter's most ignoble sentiments is an "issue" to me. McCain has exposed himself to me as a politician willing to advocate a position that is not merely not beneficial to the nation, but actually harmful, just to score some cheap points and maybe a few votes. Clinton's not much better on this issue. I don't find that to be admirable; those aren't qualities I look for in a president. I think we've had too many of those types in the White House in recent years, and all else being equal I would vote for the candidate who is willing to tell it like it is before the pandering sellout. Just my opinion - you are free to disagree. |