Hunt, Hunt, Hunt ... too bad you don't follow your own advice and not just listen to what others say and perhaps even read your own sources, which conclude:
Quote:
|
At this point, 35 years later and half a world away, we see no way to resolve which of these versions of reality is closer to the truth.
|
Of course your source also contradicts your notion that "essentially all those who were there supported Kerry's version" .
Here's the facts: there are two contradictory stories about what happened with Kerry in Vietnam. We know that Kerry has had to back down on at least one of his assertions (Christmas in Cambodia) but as to the other stories, there are conflicting eyewitness testimonies (but yet the physical and logical evidence is on the side of the Swifties - how do you explain no injuries and no bullet holes in aluminum boats that undergo "whithering fire" while they all pause to salvage the mined boat? Perhaps the VC were shooting blanks?) On another issue it is Kerry's word versus that of an Admiral whose story is also backed up by logic. Yet, somehow from this mess of conflicting evidence you are able to ascertain that the Swifties are liars. Who's the "dumb" one here?