College Confidential - View Single Post - Movies That Should Have Been Better Than They Were

asfh09 · 12-05-2008, 06:14 PM

HARRY POTTER. Mad-Eye's "eye" in the fourth movie? Katie Leung as Cho Chang? Come onnnn. That book series is one of my favorite things in the world, and the movies were disappointing. One of the only good things was Rupert Grint. Actually, none of the other actors/actresses were terrible, it was just that the actual movies themselves and the interpretation and all the changing from book to movie was not something I liked or appreciated. The Lord of the Rings, however, is on the opposite end of the spectrum - AMAZING book series, fabulous movies.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2031/...8b33a8.jpg?v=0
^ This is Daniel Radcliffe's "intense" acting face.

12-05-2008, 06:14 PM	#15
asfh09 Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: MA Posts: 325	HARRY POTTER. Mad-Eye's "eye" in the fourth movie? Katie Leung as Cho Chang? Come onnnn. That book series is one of my favorite things in the world, and the movies were disappointing. One of the only good things was Rupert Grint. Actually, none of the other actors/actresses were terrible, it was just that the actual movies themselves and the interpretation and all the changing from book to movie was not something I liked or appreciated. The Lord of the Rings, however, is on the opposite end of the spectrum - AMAZING book series, fabulous movies. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2031/...8b33a8.jpg?v=0 ^ This is Daniel Radcliffe's "intense" acting face.
	Reply