I've tried to stay away from all of the debating in this thread b/c internet fights can get ridiculous, but collegehopefull, your last argument doesn't really make sense.
Say you were to create a painting of a beautiful flower (what the painting is doesn't matter. it's just 1 am so go with it
Now obviously you are neither the paint nor the flower. You are not part of the painting. Does the fact that you are not one and the same with your painting mean that you are limited by it? Does you not being paint nor canvas take away from your ability to create or destroy a hundred paintings?
Maybe I'm misinterpreting your argument, but I don't think God not being all = a limited god.