That's not what unique means.
I don't know. To me, it can have the meaning I gave it. One definition I found is this:
having no like or equal; unparalleled; incomparable. This is along the lines of the way I was using it in.
There is no need to amend the post in that way. What I say I am meaning is not different from what I wrote (what I say I am meaning is implicit in my original post). I did not say (as you claimed) that empathy is what makes the sub-set unique; I said that it is the characteristic empathy/awareness in addition to the intelligence (of a similar level to that of theyankinlondon) that makes them all of the good things that they are.