View Single Post
Old 04-06-2007, 04:29 PM   #23
Sklog_W
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 260
Man, I'm going to thank God everyday that MIT decided to suck it up and have a "less talented" admissions pool then, because as far as I can tell they're looking out for their students when they run admissions like they do. I certainly can't speak for every MIT student, but I for one know for a fact I would be miserable at this place if they didn't decide to run admissions with a bit of subjectivity. Honestly, I don't care if the kid next to me got a 2400 on the SATs or if he's a hobo who wandered into the institute and got handed an acceptance letter, if he's someone who I'd like to hang out with I really don't mind how he got here or what his merits are.

But hey, maybe other people do care that everyone on campus is 100% qualified for their view of MIT standards, I don't know.
Sklog_W is offline   Reply