View Single Post
Old 11-21-2007, 11:14 AM   #45
Program1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Threads: 3
Posts: 23
Quote:
First off, you are still wrong on the income. This comes directly from the Bureau of Labor: Pharmacists
Why are you giving me salaries from 2004? Those postings from careerbuilder are actual companies that want to hire pharmacists. I don't see how you can argue with it.

Quote:
"C" does not mean anything. A C in med school is not a C in law school is not a C in undergrad is not a C in vet school is not a C in pharmacy school. You cannot compare them and make any reasonable conclusions. Saying that they can get C's doesn't tell us anything about the rigor of the coursework itself.
I can easily argue that computer science classes are even harder. What's so hard about pharmacy subjects? They only need to take Calc 1 in undergrad. The math that they do is simple compared to someone majoring in computer science, and pharmacists don't have to come up with algorithms. A C is very easy to get.

Quote:
Truck drivers, nurses, and mostly jobs people don't necessarily "want to do." That's how it works.
Does a college prevent them from pursuing it though? NOPE. Most truckers don't make a lot anyways. There's also over 3 million of them so of course no one is preventing anybody from getting the job. I would like to see the salary of a pharmacist go down to its equilibrium value

Quote:
OP, I just don't get your bitterness.
Well, when you have idiotic education requirements of course I'm going to be bitter. Some how a pharmacist gets more than a R&D scientist with Ph.D. Makes no sense at all.

Last edited by Program1 : 11-21-2007 at 11:22 AM.
Program1 is offline