If a person is engaging in either an inappropriate or illegal act in a "private" stall of a public bathroom (or in a "one-seater" public bathroom where no one else is in there at the time) isn't it still an issue of either public indecency or an illegal act, or lewd and lascivious behavior,depending on what they did? Was the gentleman in the article below entitled to privacy??
cleveland.com: Everything Cleveland
What about George Michael? Was he in a stall or in an open part of the bathroom (anyone remember these details??) If a person is in a bathroom stall mainlining heroin, are they entitled to privacy? I just think that the argument is silly.