| | |  | |
08-13-2008, 11:22 AM
|
#1 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: MN
Posts: 14,920
| ACT 2008 National Report Released
The ACT organization has released its national report http://www.act.org/news/data/08/pdf/National2008.pdf
on class of 2008 students. In class of 2008, 428 students around the country achieved a peak composite scaled score of 36, and any score of 34 or higher was in the very top percentile level.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 11:24 AM
|
#2 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,788
|
of those 428, 427 must be here on CC
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 11:33 AM
|
#3 | | Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 310
|
didn't 32+ used to be the top percentile?
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 11:57 AM
|
#4 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 973
|
Yea...I was top percentile with 33 two years ago.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 01:45 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: From the Walking State to the Walking City
Posts: 1,002
|
Don't only, like, 500 students take that test every year? -_-
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 01:46 PM
|
#6 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Princeton '13
Posts: 2,214
|
no..... much more than 500 people take the test.
Last edited by Peytoncline; 08-13-2008 at 01:55 PM.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 01:54 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Princeton '13
Posts: 2,214
|
there were 250 people taking it at my school in June, so i'm sure there are many many many more people that take it nationally
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:08 PM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: PA
Posts: 1,244
|
i think krypton was being a little sarcastic.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:10 PM
|
#9 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: New Orleans
Posts: 270
|
i didn't take it but i wish i had. it seems to be generally easier to understand than the SAT. i know many kids who got 1200 out of 1600 on SAT's and get 33's on ACT. I feel like its composition is a lot better and a lot less trickier than the SAT...from what i hear of course.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:25 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,052
|
Hmm that's interesting because only about 200 students get a 2400 each year. But then again, it's much harder to get a 2400 than a 36.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:36 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Long Beach --->Sonoma State '12
Posts: 2,470
|
bsb2007-that's because rather than testing you on how well you can take some stupid test, the ACT actually tests you on what you learned in high school and how much of it you retained. My ACT score was equal to a 200-point increase on my SAT score.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:51 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Princeton '13
Posts: 2,214
|
^ same here... my ACT score is equivalent to 300 more than my SAT score.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:56 PM
|
#13 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: MN
Posts: 14,920
|
The comparable figures for the SAT for class of 2008 will be released by the end of this month.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 02:59 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Arizona ---> HANOVER, NH
Posts: 1,708
| Quote: |
bsb2007-that's because rather than testing you on how well you can take some stupid test, the ACT actually tests you on what you learned in high school and how much of it you retained. My ACT score was equal to a 200-point increase on my SAT score.
| Not completely. The science section has nothing to do with what you learned in high school. The ACT reading section is kind of the same way too (more like a literary analysis exercise.) The math and English sections are better though.
|
| Reply
|
08-13-2008, 03:11 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: OH...yeah
Posts: 1,507
|
The Math and English sections of the ACT are much superior to the SAT sections, in my opinion. The ACT tests actual skills in those sections, whereas the SAT tests the arrogance of the test takers to notice its little scams.
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37 AM. |