Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.
This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Btw, is it 'illega' to 'trade' released AP Exams? I mean, Collegeboard can't possibly expect that normal people can buy every released AP exam they want to take...
umm... me and my friends definitely went out to lunch after the AP World test last year and whined about the questions at each other. Do you know if the ETC bugs sushi?
snarkiness aside, it's really not that hard to control youself for two days. I'd just say put up with the ETC's arbitrary anal-retentive-ness and save your score.
Thanks for the warning, Tri_N! I have a whole new level of respect for the ETC. Do they have ninjas too?
Last edited by tinuviel : 03-31-2008 at 11:04 AM.
Reason: I realized that Osaka was a local chain and that people might think we actually went to Japan
im pretty sure it would take a federal subpoena to get your isp to release your ip address. Since the legal agreement you make with ETS not to share results is governed only by contract law, and civil matters at that, it is impossible to assume ets lawyers could secure the information. therefore i HIGHLy doubt ETS actually positively identified a person from a message board post.
i want to point out that nowhere does it say that we cant discuss free response answers within 2 days....and while the answers might imply the questions, the rules clearly are against the articulation of the FR questions, and not the implication of them within this two day period
I agree, no one can look at an answer that isn't attached to any question and be able to get an advantage. Oh no I used the word "that"....I also put that in my FR answer....oh no I am violating rules.