College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > SAT and ACT Tests & Test Preparation > AP Tests Preparation
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-28-2008, 03:30 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Threads: 22
Posts: 183
Calc BC - question on divergence

You can't use lim n-> infinity = 0 as proof of convergence, right? If you could, that would mean 1/n converges, while we all know it diverges.

Asking because my book used it to show that sin(n^(1/2)) / n^(1/2) converged. If anybody could explain the proper way to do it, I'd be much obliged.

EDIT: I realize that's hard to read. This should make it a bit easier:

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/6250/calccs2.png

Last edited by Particle_Man : 04-28-2008 at 03:46 PM. Reason: easier to read
Particle_Man is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 04:08 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Threads: 37
Posts: 557
It seems like you're getting sequences confused with series. To show that a sequence (which in simplest terms is just a list of numbers) converges, you do take the limit as n-> infinity. If that limit exists and is finite, the sequence converges. Since it is well known that sin(x)/x -> 1 as x -> inf, the sequence {sin(n^(1/2)) / n^(1/2) } converges.

However, if you are dealing with a series, which is when you sum a list of terms, there are many different methods for showing convergence/divergence. The one that is encountered early on is known as the test for divergence. Here, you take the limit of the general term as n -> inf and if that limit does not exist or does not equal 0, then the series diverges. Note that this does not tell us whether the series converges, however if it is conclusive, then we know the series diverges.
snipez90 is offline  
Old 04-28-2008, 04:21 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Threads: 22
Posts: 183
Yep, you got that perfect. The question specified that is was a sequence, and I thought it was talking about a series. Thanks for the help.
Particle_Man is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 08:34 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Threads: 5
Posts: 118
I thought sin(x)/x goes to 1 as x approaches zero, not inf.

sin(x)/x should go to 0 as x approaches inf, right?
intellec7 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:31 AM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Gender: Male
Threads: 11
Posts: 414
Yes, it goes to 0 as x approaches infinity.

It goes to 1 as x approaches 0.
diamondbacker is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 09:57 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Threads: 24
Posts: 172
this is a CHART with all the series/sequences tests. i found it very helpful...got me a 100 on my calc 2 exam last semester.

http://abacus.bates.edu/acad/acad_su...ence_tests.pdf
Musikalgeak is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 04:37 PM   #7
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 1
Posts: 7
You can't use lim n-> infinity = 0 as proof of convergence, right? If you could, that would mean 1/n converges, while we all know it diverges.

Asking because my book used it to show that sin(n^(1/2)) / n^(1/2) converged. If anybody could explain the proper way to do it, I'd be much obliged.

EDIT: I realize that's hard to read. This should make it a bit easier:
-----------------------------------------
I believe you are thinking of the nth term test for divergence. If the limit as n goes to infinity does not equal zero, than the series diverges. If the limit as n goes to infinity does equal zero, it is not conclusive. For 1/n, the nth term is 0, so it can't be used as a way to show convergence/divergence.

For sine of root n over square root n, one can use the integral to test to show that from any number to infinity, the area under the curve diverges.
Sethie2000 is offline  
Old 04-30-2008, 05:39 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Threads: 5
Posts: 118
You may also choose to think of it this way:
sin(x) is a function whose range is -1 to 1, never larger or smaller, like x is a function whose range is -inf to inf. so you can show that the denominator is growing without bound while the numerator is bounded.
intellec7 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0