College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > SAT and ACT Tests & Test Preparation > AP Tests Preparation

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-29-2008, 09:05 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 93
cylindrical shells in calc bc?

for the ap calc bc exam, do you have to know how to use cylindrical shells? my teacher didnt teach it to us because he said its off the ap requirements and you only need the washers/disk method. is that true, or should i study it anyways? thanks.
jason88 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:14 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 563
yes that is true, but you should only study them if you think you're pretty comfortable with other big topics such as diffeqs, parametric/polar, series, fundamental theorem, approximations...

shells come in handy usually when your differential is parallel to the axis of revolution. It's useful if you're lazy like me and don't feel like interchanging variables (the volume question on the AP test almost guarantees that you only have to integrate w/ respect to x) the formula for the shell method is also very easy to apply and it should only 20-30 minutes to get understand the formula and do a problem or two.
snipez90 is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 09:14 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: valley of the sun, AZ
Posts: 528
You should definitely memorize the formula and know how to apply it: you technically don't need it for the AP exam, but it can be very helpful on a lot of problems.
diamondbacker is offline  
Old 04-29-2008, 11:09 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 430
The key is the representative cross-section:

If your cross-section lies parallel to the axis of revolution, shells will work. If your cross-section lies perpendicular to the axis of revolution, discs/washers will work.

The direction of your cross-section will frequently be based on what's easier to work with. For instance, in cases where y is a function of x, you tend to use discs/washers around a horizontal line, but shells around a vertical line.

The way you get around using shells when you want to revolve around a vertical line is to solve that function for an x = equation as a relation of y.

In some cases, transferring from one form to the other is difficult, and so the AP folks have basically guaranteed that you can always use a discs/washers form, while the shells form might not always work.

That being said, if you have the time and feel comfortable with the normal stuff, shells might be easier than discs/washers on a particular problem, and some students prefer volumes by shells to discs/washers, even if the calculations aren't necessarily "easier".
TheMathProf is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0