| I think any program will value that a student has been committed to endeavors outside the classroom over time with dedication, significant contributions, leadership, and achievements even if they do not expect you to continue those ECs while in their program. It still says something about the individual.
My kid is applying to MArch programs and has attended a panel on which reps from the graduate programs sat. I know you are asking about BArch programs but I'm bringing this up as an even more extreme situation as grad students don't do ECs. However, my D said that they said they looked favorably upon athletes, for example, (she mentioned this to me as she is a varsity sport athlete in college, and was in HS as well), as it showed them about time management and committment and achievement and so forth. This isn't the main factor of getting into college or graduate school but they are looking at PEOPLE, not just stats and what sets one person apart from another. Yes, you have to have the talent (portfolio), the academic achievement (grades, test scores, academic achievements), essays, recs, etc. but how you spend your time and your level of commitment and achievement in endeavors also show things about you as a person. Such things can put you in a favorable light. Someone who has achieved highly in their ECs with huge time commitments, all the while being a top student and also having arch talent, has qualities they may be looking for considering the intensity of arch programs. |