| In the arts and humanities, it is generally acceptable to follow a non-linear track (getting a grad degree with different subject/nomenclature than undergrad degree) if you do the following things:
1) clearly demonstrate knowledge of and interest in the subject of the masters degree you are applying for. This can mean minoring in it, getting work experience in it, or just taking enough classes in it to show you know what's up and you interest is genuine.
2) relate your undergrad experience to the graduate degree you hope to get: for example, majors that transition well into urban planning would be architecture, landscape architecture, development, business, or policy. There are probably others that I'm not thinking of at the moment. Basically, be able to explain how/why your undergrad relates to your subject of graduate study and your eventual career path. Even if you're going non-linear, you don't want to pingpong all over the place either.
So if you get a B.A. in history, I would be sure to take elective classes on architectural history, the development of communities, planning theory, etc. If you can fit that into a minor, great, but if not at least you will end up with a solid knowledge of exactly what about planning it is that floats your boat and a cohesive statement of purpose that can convince graduate schools that you are literate in the subject and deserve a spot there. |