HomeschoolDad,
You have a lot of misconceptions about the IB programme, which you are presenting as facts. I feel compelled to correct them:
1) You claim that the super bright science/math students cannot study at a sufficiently advanced level compared with AP.
FALSE. You imply that the AP Physics C is for these super bright students, whereas the IB Physics HL isn't. Well if this is true, would you care to explain to me why MIT has the following requirements for Physics course credits:
AP: For a score of 5 on both parts of the Physics C test, credit will be given for 12 units of subject 8.01, Physics I. For scores lower than 5, no credit is awarded.
IB HL: For a score of a 7, credit will be given for 12 units of subject 8.01, Physics I and students may begin immediately with subject 8.02 or 8.022 (Physics II).
2) You claim that IB has nothing comparable to AP Computer Science AB.
FALSE. If that is true, why on earth is there a course that's called Computer Science, offered both at HL and SL, on the IB statistical bulletins?
3) You claim that the really smart kids who take the IB cannot take advanced college-level courses in mathematics.
FALSE. If that is true, what the heck is the IB Further Mathematics SL course then? And why, of the 20 US students who took that exam in 2006, 10 got a 2, 1 got a 6, and no one got a 7?
This gets me to a pretty important issue that you have ignored: grade inflation. On the IB HL Math exam in May 2007, 8% got a 7, mean grade being 4.43. On the AP Calculus BC exam in 2007, 43% got a 5, mean grade being 3.70 (note that IB scale goes from 1-7, AP only from 1-5). Does that not imply, that if looked upon as equivalent courses (again I suggest you visit for instance MIT's website, where you will notice that they give the same credit), a 5 in Calculus BC exam is relatively a lot easier to achieve than a 7 in HL Math? This has been proven to be true by a lot of students in other threads; a 7 in a HL subject is generally harder to get than a 5 in AP.
And where did you get the idea that IB students are prohibited to take courses at the local college, whereas AP students aren't?
4) You claim that IB students cannot take 'cutting-edge languages', like Mandarin or Japanese.
FALSE. How many AP exams were there again? 37? Of these 37, 6 are languages: Spanish, German, French, Japanese, Chinese and Italian. So AP has Japanese, Chinese and Italian, that IB supposedly doesn't? Well guess what: IB has all of them and a whole lot more. Yep, from Albanian to Vietnamese, the IB basically has them all. And the IB has nearly all of them at three different levels, A1 i.e. literature, A2 i.e. literature of a foreign language, and B i.e. foreign language, with all these both at HL and SL.
Some other people as well have made remarks about the IB's inflexibility, which actually is not due to the programme itself, but the individual schools and their scarce resources. Not all IB schools can offer all the subjects, (examples of ones not offered by AP: Business and Management, Information Technology in a Global Society, Philosophy, Theatre Arts, Social & Cultural Anthropology and Design Technology), just like not all American high schools can offer all of the 37 AP's. Consequently, IB is actually more diverse than AP given the amount of different subjects and exams available.
The IBO is also not that strict on the subject choices as it is implied here. In my school there are students with all sciences at HL, who will also do the final exams at HL, and students with no subjects from the social sciences.
You also talked about College Board:
"The College Board, administrator of AP, is a consortium of all highly-ranked private universities and LACs, every public flagship university, all well-respected high schools. It's an American institution." Let's connect this with a statement you made before: "In one state flagship university I am familiar with, every AP subject is creditable, with suitable exam score, but only one-third of IB subjects are. Not because there is an anti-IB prejudice—the university would love to give credit to speed people along and lower enrollment impaction"
Shouldn't you be able to see something fishy going on here? If the universities are the ones behind the AP, then wouldn't they be biased in determining acceleration-credit policies? Wouldn't they want to protect their own creation, i.e. the AP? There is no reason for universities to give more credit to IB exams, even if they actually should, as this would create an incentive for students to do the IB instead of AP.
Oh and as a final remark, I have no idea where you got your background information from. The IB diploma programme was created in 1968, not in 1924. (
International Baccalaureate Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)
--------------------------------------
IB 2009
HL: Mathematics, Physics, Economics, English B
SL: Further Mathematics, A1 Finnish, French B