Although BC's endowment is very impressive, it's not enough to help to fork the bill. BC is entering the big league which has A LOT of traditionally well endowed universities and colleges. To compete, it has to build build (of course, its competitor is build build build too). Although BC is spending 25 cents of every dollar of tuition it collects on financial aid, it frankly is not enough.
http://www.bc.edu/publications/factb..._fact_book.pdf
(page 71)
I honestly think, however, that students would rather go to a good school they can afford rather than go to a brand spanking, state-of-the-art school and owing a mounting of debt. If I was father Leahy, it would moderate my expansion plan (meaning less fancy buildings), invest in more professors and teaching quality, actively recruit highly motivated students and give them a good financial aid that they can live with. And develops programs to prepare those students for competitive academic fellowships and cutting-edge careers. In the long run we will benefit by crops of talented alumni who would build our reputation from the ground up. And with the generous financial aid they received from their alma mater, they would be motivated to give back to their school. If I was an alumnus who still owed $160k years after I graduated and is forced in to a career in order to pay for my debt instead of one that I genuinely can contribute, I would think twice about donating to BC.
Sure, if we follow my plan, we won't have 50 Nobel laureates hanging around Hillside posing for our college brochure, but we will have a very dedicated and grateful group of alumni who can spread the "gospel" of BC.