| | |  |
04-27-2008, 10:33 AM
|
#1 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: RI
Posts: 698
| WashU Is WashU a better and more prestigious school than Brown? |
| |
04-27-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#2 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 239
| "Better" is pretty subjective but Brown takes the cake for prestige, I would say. |
| |
04-27-2008, 01:54 PM
|
#3 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,000
| No way! (@ the OP) |
| |
04-27-2008, 05:14 PM
|
#4 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 104
| That's funny...Wash U being better than Brown...hahahahaha right. |
| |
04-27-2008, 06:27 PM
|
#5 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,601
| usually the answer is "it depends..." but in this case i think we can safely say...no and no. |
| |
04-28-2008, 12:09 AM
|
#6 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: RI
Posts: 698
| I think WashU would be better for pre-med and biological sciences, no? |
| |
04-28-2008, 06:20 AM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,601
| how so?
brown is in the top 5 in the nation for the percentage of students who are admitted to their top choice medical schools |
| |
04-28-2008, 06:57 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: LINY/Providence
Posts: 1,928
| dcircle-- it comes from the misconception that having a good medical school, which almost always has a completely separate facility, completely separate faculty, completely separate endowment (which is added in for US News, of course), completely separate courses for med students only, etc, some how effects the undergraduate student body. |
| |
04-28-2008, 12:14 PM
|
#9 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: RI
Posts: 698
| I didn't mention anything about the medical school. I just said WashU is better in the biological sciences area, which it is.
Refresh me on the difference in rank between Brown and WashU, Bustles? |
| |
04-28-2008, 01:01 PM
|
#10 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: LINY/Providence
Posts: 1,928
| I'm not really sure what rankings really matter for undergraduate, but what I can tell you is combined with the fact that Brown is in the top 5 for getting into choice med schools that our brand new 95 million dollar research facilities coupled with a 4:1 concentrator to investigator ratio (including declared juniors and seniors matched to non-clinical, non-research only professors leading lab groups), Brown is a pretty great place to be for the biological sciences. Add the resources we have because of our separate and strong neuroscience and cognitive science departments, very strong computational biology groups which work across biology and CS, and a biochemistry program that flourishes due to its strong connection sitting directly between the chemistry and biology departments, and I can say that Brown is one of the best choices of Life Sciences.
But if you have an answer in mind before starting this thread, please do share.
If you have some metric that you think out classes all others, please do share and why that metric is more meaningful than others. |
| |
04-29-2008, 08:54 PM
|
#11 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Brown
Posts: 422
| Nothing better than a high schooler posting questions to which he assumes to already have the answer to. |
| |
04-29-2008, 09:24 PM
|
#12 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 351
| For someone who posted on a thread on the Notre Dame board saying you are "not a fan of USNR rankings" simply because Georgetown is ranked lower than Notre Dame, you are being quite a hypocrite in using the USNR rankings in this thread to justify your own opinion that WashU is better than Brown just because it is ranked two places higher on the USNR rankings. Don't start a thread asking questions when your mind is clearly already made up. |
| |
04-29-2008, 10:11 PM
|
#13 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: RI
Posts: 698
| ^wow, some people take CC way too seriously |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM. |