CMU will be the toughest socially, academics and location-wise. Assuming you're personable you ought to be able to get into Pitt parties. It has the worst weather, although I don't think Pittsburgh itself is as bad as it's made out to be. It has the best program out of the three, by
far, if your interest is quant stuff (which financial engineering would suggest).
I'm not going to speak on Emory because I have no real experience with the school, mostly because Atlanta is hell and having connecting flights through Hartsfield is enough to give me a seizure.
UVA's business program is very good, I've always felt that at the undergraduate level it's seconld only to Ross amongst state schools, but you don't have guaranteed admittance to McIntire. I personally couldn't choose McIntire over Tepper without a guarantee from UVA, and that's a guarantee that can't be gotten.
I've always believed that Tepper is the most underrated business school, and their CIT students do amazingly well. And while it's tough academically, CMU students are much,
much less obnoxious and grade-conscious than MIT kids.
Sports-wise, I'm pretty sure my 13 year old niece could be a starter for CMU's football team. I have to imagine Emory isn't exactly spectacular in that arena, either. You probably won't be good enough to play at an intercollegiate level for most UVA teams, while you will at CMU or Emory. The trade-off is that school spirit relating to sports isn't as high. I'd personally rather be a starter on a bad intercollegiate team in a laughable division than play intramural stuff because the real team is too good, though, so it kind of depends on how you feel about that.
Quote:
|
UVA has the best finance program as well.
|
USNews.com: America's Best Colleges 2008: Quantitative Analysis
It's pretty difficult to put a 1 year finance program (which is esssentially what a McIntire track is) over a school that has 2-3 years of finance electives available to students.