bbtitle]
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

Go Back   College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Colleges and Universities > Alphabetic List of Colleges > C > Chapman University
New User

Welcome to College Confidential, the leading college-bound community on the Web!
 
Here you'll find hundreds of pages of articles about choosing a college, getting into the college you want, how to pay for it, and much more. You'll also find the Web's busiest discussion community related to college admissions, and our College Visits section!

You are currently viewing the site as a guest.
Registration is simple and easy, and provides full site access.

Join our FREE community:

  • Post and reply to topics
  • Talk privately with other members
  • Participate in polls
  • View less ads
  • Remove this welcome message

 REGISTER NOW

Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! College Visits
»NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
CC Resources for Chapman University
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-02-2009, 04:27 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2
Is everyone aware they are planning to radiate OC in September?

They are planning to open the dome at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, about 25 miles away, in September, to replace a generator. They will be cutting a huge wedge in the dome to open it up, and this is expected to release tons of radiation into the atmosphere. San Onofre has been caught faking five years of safety inspections and turning off their safety backups for years. The NRC felt the remedy for the fraud was to tell them to hold a safety class. SONGS came close to a Chernobyl-style meltdown a couple of years ago when a fire almost hit it while the backup safeguards were down.

The NRC is holding hearings and everyone planning to attend Chapman, which is within the area that will be radiated, needs to fight this thing. The NRC used to be the AEC. They conducted 50 years of radiation experiments on unsuspecting Americans, while lying to the public. At one point, they fed radioactive cereal to boys at a school to see what effect it would have. Most died. The lesson: don't eat cereal unless you know it's not from Quaker Oats or the NRC. The NRC is expected to say that radiation won't hurt anyone.

OC has some of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. Some are in the epidemic proportions and studies have linked them to San Onofre.
countmein is offline   Reply   
Old 05-02-2009, 06:26 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 181
Isn't San Onofre quite a ways away from Chapman? Not FAR...but like...30+ mins?
socalscott is offline   Reply   
Old 05-02-2009, 06:33 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 65
where can I read more about this?
monkarrr is offline   Reply   
Old 05-02-2009, 06:44 PM   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12
yeah...this is disturbing...and 30 min isnt that far
nagga95 is offline   Reply   
Old 05-02-2009, 09:36 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 281
Information here:

Nuke-plant parts creeping up coast to San Onofre - Steam generators to be replaced — Alliance For Nuclear Responsibility

Now I have to see about the tons of radiation portion of the OP's message!
investorscooter is offline   Reply   
Old 05-04-2009, 02:33 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 175
Last weekend, there were four resolutions before the California Democratic Party to try to close down the plant. The situation is very serious and Chapman is close enough to have major exposure problems when they open the dome. Here are some links about San Onofre.



San Onofre Nuclear Plant Caught Falsifying Records - San Diego News Story - KGTV San Diego
San Onofre Nuclear Plant Caught Falsifying Records
...



San Onofre Nuclear Plant: Highest Childhood Leukemia Death Rates
San Onofre Nuclear Plant: Highest Childhood Leukemia Death Rates
...


As San Onofre struggles with errors, NRC scrutiny picks up - OC Watchdog - OCRegister.com
As San Onofre struggles with errors, NRC scrutiny picks up

Last edited by funfun; 05-04-2009 at 02:47 AM.
funfun is offline   Reply   
Old 05-04-2009, 02:43 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 175
Here are some more articles:

San Onofre Risks to Children
WILL OUR LEADERS SAVE LIVES BY CLOSING SAN ONOFRE?
ARE OUR LEADERS WILLING TO LET CHILDREN DIE?

Orange County News - San Onofre Nightmare Generating Station - page 1
San Onofre Nightmare Generating Station
10 reasons we should say so long to SONGS

Ace Hoffman's blog -- mostly about nukes: 24 Reasons to Shut San Onofre Nuclear Waste Generating Station TODAY, not Tomorrow! (Expanded Version)
24 Reasons to Shut San Onofre Nuclear Waste Generating Station TODAY, not Tomorrow! (Expanded Version)
funfun is offline   Reply   
Old 05-07-2009, 04:38 PM   #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 19
"OC has some of the highest cancer rates in the U.S. Some are in the epidemic proportions and studies have linked them to San Onofre."

Can you back this up please? You can't just say this without giving details...
gregcotten is offline   Reply   
Old 05-07-2009, 04:58 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 281
I'm actually just browsing the web, looking for info, and stumbled across this, which if it's correct, would indicate lower levels of cancer incidence than many CA counties.

California Cancer Lawsuit: Cancer Statistics in CA

Here is link to the downloadable 124 page report for years 2001 - 2008, published in 2008.

UCI CANCER REGISTRY

Lots of reading! I'll start mine now!
investorscooter is offline   Reply   
Old 05-13-2009, 08:13 PM   #10
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 5
Is it just me or does this all just should like a bunch of tabloid hoo-haw? If you ain't got sources you ain't got a case.
john-torkington is offline   Reply   
Old 05-14-2009, 01:53 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 175
It is real. A lot of Orange County residents are very upset about the plans to perform this dangerous experiment next to homes and schools.

TMI and Chernobyl had more conscientious operators than San Onofre does. Both situation were operator error. The safety violations at San Onofre are the worst of any plant in the United States.

San Onofre came close to a meltdown a couple of years ago. The safety systems were off when the wildfires almost hit the plant.

It is also on top of a major earthquake fault.

Another interesting source is the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility. Alliance Home Page — Alliance For Nuclear Responsibility

This Indymedia article is very much worth reading.

Radioactive Waste: The San Onofre File : Indybay
...
San Onofre’s liquid radwastes flow out of the plants through “outflows” pipes and empty into the Pacific. They are highly diluted but nevertheless still there.

According to the plant’s 2007 Radioactive Effluent Release Report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, there were 202 liquid effluent “batch” releases that year.

These releases lasted a total of 489 hours, or over 20 days. The longest was 7.6 hours in duration. The releases averaged 2.4 hours.

The releases contained many dangerous radioactive chemicals, including cesium 137, cobalt 60, iodine 131 and strontium 90.

Cesium 137 has a radioactive life of over 300 years, cobalt 60’s over 50 years, and strontium 90’s almost 300.

Iodine 131’s radioactive life is only a few months, but during that time it is intensely radioactive. I-131 mimics regular iodine, and concentrates in the thyroid gland if it enters our bodies.

I-131 caused high rates of thyroid cancer after Chernobyl exploded and burned its nuclear core, releasing virtually all its radioactivity.

San Onofre’s airborne radioactive releases included all of the radioactive chemicals cited above.

The 2007 report informs us “waste gas decay tank releases are considered to be ‘batch’ releases. Containment purges and plant stack releases are considered to be ‘continuous’ releases.”

Though San Onofre Unit 1 permanently shut down in 1992, the 2007 report states that its liquid and gaseous radioactive releases did not cease until 2006.

And in 2007, though Unit 1 had been shut down for nearly 15 years, a radioactive accident happened in April, the report states.

During the transfer of the contents of a large liquid container there, “a worker noticed a steady flow of water exiting a pipe onto the sand in an area that had been recently excavated.”

Turns out that a pipe had been “inadvertently severed…As a result, nearly all of the contents…about 2000 gallons, spilled through the severed pipe onto the sand.”

The spill contained “trace amounts” of cesium 137, according to the report.

..

However, numerous studies have found higher rates of cancers around nuclear power plants, such as the one reported recently in the OB Rag that found high mortality rates for childhood leukemia in counties adjacent to San Onofre. And virtually all nuke dumps, such as the massive one in Barnwell, South Carolina, have already leaked.

In addition, in 2005 the National Academy of Sciences committee to study the effects of radiation on our health concluded that there is no exposure to radiation without risk.

The committee’s chairman, Richard Monson of the Harvard School of Public Health, stated “The health risks—particularly the development of solid cancers in organs—rises proportionally with exposure. At low doses of radiation, the risk of inducing solid cancers is very small. As the overall lifetime exposure increases, so does the risk.”

And since San Onofre has been operating since 1970, there are all too many lifetime exposures already.

And you will note that EnergySolutions low level waste dump isn’t anywhere near its HQ of Salt Lake City, but instead embedded in a restricted and defiled region riddled with the remains of atomic explosions, whose memory will forever shame mankind.

San Onofre’s owners would like to operate their two remaining active reactors for an extra 20 years, until 2042, to continue their legacy of contamination for an extra generation, and its consequences for many more generations.

With true green energy looming on the horizon as real energy solutions for our future, why let the insanity that is San Onofre waste it?
funfun is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WHAT THE....I was NOT aware of this.... bws1993 What Are My Chances? 8 03-23-2009 02:55 PM
Need aware.... 2collegewego Tufts University 2 11-13-2007 01:53 PM
need aware? rlaalsk Financial Aid & Scholarships 1 04-04-2006 06:57 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Copyright 2001-2009, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved