College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > College Admissions

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-11-2008, 09:18 PM   #856
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago '12
Posts: 466
What do you mean?
somedumbnoob is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 09:24 PM   #857
Bay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,212
Look at the "pool" of URM high school graduates, and then tell me they "enjoy a much higher acceptance rate" to college. Isn't this the real problem that AA is seeking to address?
Bay is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 09:25 PM   #858
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago '12
Posts: 466
I didn't say "URM high school graduates." I said "URM applicants." And my statement was completely accurate given the kinds of colleges this now merged thread was talking about...at top universities, blacks and hispanics applicants are generally admitted at a higher rate than the overall applicant pool. Why don't you actually make an effort to understand things before laughing pretentiously?

Scroll down a bit on this page.

College Admission Officers

Last edited by somedumbnoob; 05-11-2008 at 09:32 PM.
somedumbnoob is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 09:34 PM   #859
Bay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,212
sdn,

Sorry, I did not mean for you to take my comment personally. I am very familiar with the analysis you are referencing, and yes, you are factually accurate. I guess I am just tired of hearing the same rant about how "easy" URMs have it when it comes to college admissions. People seem to forget what a long shot it really is for many of them to even make it to the application stage. Peace.
Bay is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 11:22 PM   #860
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ga
Posts: 69
i refuse to put my race down on pure principle- not b/c I want to play some admissions strategy. First of all, when I was taking my apush exam last friday for example, the boxes you could check were like "African-American" "Pacific Islander" "Native American" etc...and then "white". Why "white"? Why not caucasian? It made me idignant, along wiht several other friends, including an Indian, an Asian, and an African-American. How totally degrading
......plus I don't want to encourage racial stereotypes....so and so got xxx on the sat and she's xxxx.....just goes to show all xxx's are like that...
so I've always, always, chosen not to bubble in my ethnicity
btw what are orms and urms?
IsabelB is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 11:35 PM   #861
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 11,335
Quote:
what are orms and urms?
Usually those abbreviations mean on College Confidential forums "over-represented minorities" and "under-represented minorities." I'm not sure how many college admission offices, if any, use either term in a formal way.
tokenadult is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:04 AM   #862
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: one nation, under a groove----->a place where they get down-just for the funk of it
Posts: 936
Quote:
but overall it is far easier for URMs to get into school.
Tell that to the disappointed (and highly qualified) URMs at my school who weren't accepted to their "dream" colleges...

Quote:
First of all, when I was taking my apush exam last friday for example, the boxes you could check were like "African-American" "Pacific Islander" "Native American" etc...and then "white". Why "white"? Why not caucasian? It made me idignant, along wiht several other friends, including an Indian, an Asian, and an African-American. How totally degrading
Degrading how? (ugh, PC crap)... My memory is probably failing me at the moment, but as I recall, the Collegeboard tests ask if you're "White/Caucasian, Black/African-American, etc." Cual es el problema?
arachnophobia12 is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:50 AM   #863
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
^^^la problema
lol
swimg907 is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 12:58 AM   #864
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: one nation, under a groove----->a place where they get down-just for the funk of it
Posts: 936
^^^ no, it's actually "el problema"... (el mapa, el alma/las almas, etc.).
arachnophobia12 is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 01:18 AM   #865
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 419
Quote:
I guess I am just tired of hearing the same rant about how "easy" URMs have it when it comes to college admissions. People seem to forget what a long shot it really is for many of them to even make it to the application stage. Peace.
The difficulty you speak of should be evaluated on a case by case basis. Plenty of URMs have no trouble at all getting to the application stage, and affirmative action gives them an undeserved boost at the expense of ORMs.

If an applicant has really faced overwhelming odds in their lives, they should be able to articulate such in their essay. If one had to undergo tremendous hardship because of their race, what better place to put it than in your essay? Assuming that every black/latino has had to overcome so much adversity is generalizing that need not be done. Additionally, there are plenty of Asian americans who have to deal with overt racism, and this would level the playing field for them as well.

Quote:
Quote:
but overall it is far easier for URMs to get into school.
Tell that to the disappointed (and highly qualified) URMs at my school who weren't accepted to their "dream" colleges...
While there are definitely qualified URMs who are rejected by their dream schools, their numbers pale in comparison to those of qualified ORMs who don't make it.
JP_Omnipotence is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 09:54 AM   #866
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 11,335
I have just updated the thread-opening post with a moderator's edit to update statistics and add more links to official websites.
tokenadult is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:33 AM   #867
Bay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,212
JO-

I think you are confusing two distinct diversity goals. Elite u's want a racially diverse campus, and they want an economically diverse campus (as well as geographically diverse, EC diverse, etc.). Applicants having an under-represented socioeconomic background of any race get special consideration.
U's value racial diversity for its own sake, i.e., there is educational value in having their students learn, live and recreate with students of all races, because racial harmony is important to our country and our world.
Bay is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 02:11 PM   #868
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,477
@arachnophobia

Actually, it asks for "white" not caucasian. I would know because I usually check caucasian instantly but not "white". My parents are Iranian. Iranians are caucasian, but I don't think "white" is any real designation.
afruff23 is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 02:23 PM   #869
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,596
I prefer the more descriptive "European American" as a parallel to other accepted labels.
vossron is offline  
Old 05-13-2008, 02:25 PM   #870
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 419
While I do agree that a racially diverse student body is better than one that is weighted more towards one or two races, this is a case where I believe that the ends do not justify the means. Compromising equal opportunity in favor of racial diversity is in my opinion not at all worth it. Diversity can be found in a multitude of ways, and even a mono-racial student body can be incredibly diverse in thoughts, beliefs, and viewpoints.

My other complaint with affirmative action is the way it generalizes. After all, all of the racial classifications (white, black, asian, latino) are very broad, so even if a student body is say, 70% asian, this might be divided between malaysians, japanese, chinese, etc. What AA promotes is diversity based on skin color, nothing else.

Compromising equality and giving applicants undeserved advantages in order to ensure a very shallow skin color based diversity is not worth it.
JP_Omnipotence is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0