| | |  | |
02-06-2008, 12:22 AM
|
#121 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: new joisy
Posts: 3,483
| Quote: |
And I hate it when people throw around the word "nerd" as the ultimate insult- it just means intellectually curious, not "plodder," "boring," "no social life," or anything else! I don't understand why it's a BAD thing now to achieve academically- if you think so, what are you doing on this site? Don't make stupid assumptions about other people either.
| I didn't like the use of the word "nerd" either but i think he means study freak or something. Quote: |
Yes, I do study for less than 2 hours a day. If you read my entire post, I'm not exactly proud of it.
| sigh, it really depends on your school. so yes, it's definitely possible--just because it's impossible at your school doesn't mean it applies everywhere else.
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 12:29 AM
|
#122 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,540
|
peace, plz. Let this thread die.
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 06:32 AM
|
#123 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hyde Park
Posts: 2,300
|
Agreed. 10
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 02:09 PM
|
#124 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 370
|
asdfjkl1:
But in the end, the chair usually recognizes the person who goes up and speaks, even if it is to give credit to less spoken countries. MUN is probably the best example of a "good" EC that takes 90% charisma/BS and 10% research, sadly enough. I've never met anyone at my school that really slaves over research for MUN, and our school usually takes home the top prize at every conference. Not bragging, just putting the truth out there.
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 02:38 PM
|
#125 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,011
|
^^so it's like the real thing then...
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 04:15 PM
|
#126 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,662
|
After reading this thread I want to add one comment. IQ is only a measure of potential, and should therefore never be used for college admissions.
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 10:34 PM
|
#127 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 343
|
if you can get a 4.0 and a 2350+ by studying less than 2 hours a day with 6 AP classes, then your either a nerd who needs to play some sports or get some action or your school has massive grade inflation or both...
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 11:32 PM
|
#128 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: new joisy
Posts: 3,483
| Quote: |
your school has massive grade inflation or both...
| that's probably it.
|
| Reply
|
02-06-2008, 11:52 PM
|
#129 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: party central.
Posts: 1,735
|
Well, yes. gk4. Personally, I've won awards from major MUN conferences. But, unlike most who TRY to screw over others, I try to be the nice person who includes the people who are not chrimastic enough to carry the committee. Yes, I'm that girl raising her placard x43554 per second, getting yields from people because I was nice to them while speaking at every opportunity.
It's how you say it. It's true. In my school, you must take a class to become a delegate--and you must be a leader/successful at conferences to go on future conferences. And, screwing over others is not allowed in my school though overkill research is heavily encouraged. We haven't really won BIG awards in recent years. I'm hoping that my next MUN conference is FTW. It's my last conference and I plan on dominating with my partner!
Interestingly enough, I will be chairing my own committee soon. And soon, those who don't work hard will be screwed over because I will not be turning a blind eye to unethical things.
|
| Reply
|
02-07-2008, 02:52 AM
|
#130 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 343
|
I don't care how genetically smart you are... you can't ace a college bio test without even opening the textbook. You need to study 2+ hours for the test. Maybe it's just my school cause my teacher's lecture is right off the book and her lectures are very general/vague
|
| Reply
|
02-07-2008, 07:34 AM
|
#131 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,540
|
asdfjkl1, which conference to you go to?
|
| Reply
|
02-07-2008, 03:27 PM
|
#132 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: new joisy
Posts: 3,483
|
Lol, i agree with Bio being pretty much strictly memorization (and therefore nobody is born with the knowledge). But other subjects (especially math) we can't make the same generalization. It's your school, lol, so you probably know best. At mine it's a bit different.
|
| Reply
|
02-07-2008, 04:51 PM
|
#133 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Hyde Park
Posts: 2,300
|
Yea, because you're born knowing the pythagorean theorem and dy/dx
|
| Reply
|
02-07-2008, 05:45 PM
|
#134 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,424
|
To go back to the original post:
The admission officer that spoke to us when we visited Columbia insisted that one of the most important tasks of the Admissions Committee was to make up a class that would be interesting and challenging enough to make their teachers happy and wanting to teach. And unless you applied you wouldn't know if you had something to offer that they wanted. They know you all are intellectually capable. Interesting enough? That's another story.
That was one of the many things he said and his presentation was by far the best one of all the ones we attended.
|
| Reply
|
02-07-2008, 06:05 PM
|
#135 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,286
| Quote: |
But other subjects (especially math) we can't make the same generalization. It's your school, lol, so you probably know best. At mine it's a bit different.
| you're pretty wrong here. no one knows that he or she can do a problem until he or she has been given the tools to do the problem.
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM. |