Quote:
|
I question the sincerity of a program that takes 50K from universities and colleges to serve as headhunters for students.
|
Why? There are other programs like it, like the Posse Program and Upward Bound. I guarantee you: QuestBridge is a 100% sincere organization, and the Match program is 100% legitimate.
Quote:
|
With all of the financial aid initiatives available to moderate and lower income students; they should have the opportunity to not be bound to the schools that pay questbridge.
|
Uh, they do; they don't have to apply through QuestBridge. The organization just flags them as high-achieving, low-income students.
Quote:
|
I also think that it should not be binding if you only have a minimal number of schools in the program, most of which are small liberal arts colleges.
|
Think of it like this: many schools have ED programs. That means you can apply only to their university. It doesn't logically make sense to apply to multiple schools ED; however, ranking the colleges adds a new dimension to the process. And that's what QuestBridge has done: it has taken ED programs and combined them. There are many advantages: you get to apply early and get the whole college application process over with, you get to apply to multiple schools early, and best of all, you get a guaranteed, four-year scholarship.
In addition, half of the partners are top-20 universities, including Princeton, Yale, MIT, Penn, Stanford, Chicago, Columbia, and more. And the majority of the LACs are elite ones: Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, Bowdoin, Pomona, Wellesley, etc.
You can only have a certain number of colleges, and not many of them, since the requirements are many: the college must have the financial resources to give full scholarships; the college must desire to diversify the socioeconomic makeup of its student body; the college must pay money to support the organization and the program; the college must be willing to evaluate applicants early; and so on.
Quote:
|
The logistics involved in planning their conferences at various colleges throughout the United States (and paying part of a lot of students' travel), paying their part-time and FULL-time employees a decent salary, and as you can possibly acknowledge, all the difficult processes involved in everything, do cost money. And a lot of it.
|
Exactly. It costs QuestBridge $1.6 million per year to run these programs.
In the past, they've given students laptops, free SAT prep courses, free college counseling, free college conferences with helpful workshops and college fairs, and more.
Quote:
|
I just think if this was really a sincere effort they would not bind the students, but they have to because they need to justify the 50K they get from the universities, so they have to deliver diversity.
|
Believe me, that's not why. It's ED because that's the essential idea of it. ED has long made admissions very unfair for low-income students--and this program is essentially
ED just for low-income students.
Not to mention the most popularly ranked schools aren't even binding! If your claim were true, QuestBridge wouldn't allow Stanford, Princeton, Yale, etc. to be partners, because it's non-binding for them.
Plus, QuestBridge "delivers" diversity by a) actively recruiting only low-income students, and b) connecting these students and the colleges.
Quote:
|
If Questbridge was really sincere about alleviating social inequities their "delivery" of results would be that the student is going to college PERIOD not just xy and z college that pay off questbridge.
|
What? Are you suggesting the QuestBridge itself give the scholarships? That would be
exorbitantly expensive, and impossible, for the organization; they already struggle to meet the $1.6 million budget, but giving the scholarships would require another $40 million.
It's either that, or QuestBridge become a partner with every college in the US.
Are either of these practical? Nope.
Quote:
|
Hey does anyone know when the application for this year will be up on Questbridge?
|
It should be up mid-August (last year, it was August 15th).