College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > College Admissions

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2008, 05:03 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 53
my school is exactly like INVENIAM'S
crisscross is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 05:24 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,215
@ Butternut:

Don't you lose being both first and last in rank, and in all the deciles?


Homeschooled as well :P
lolcats4 is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 05:54 PM   #18
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A House
Posts: 488
Does anyone know how competitive class of '10 is?
Equilibrium is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 06:31 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 207
next year's will be harder than this years. and the year after that(my year, '10 for highchool 14 for college) will be even harder than you '13s. and the year after mine will be even more competitive than us, however i bet by that time many colleges will increase class size to accommodate all the qualified students (because that's just how lucky i am)


equil, at least the int'ls are VERY competitive our year. I live in Canada, and it seems all the smart people are in my year. the smartest 14 year olds all skipped a grade to compete with us for some reason... and the best.. 5 people in my grade in my school is like better than the best '09 and close to the best '08.
u§ername is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 09:37 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CAMBRIDGE, MA, USA
Posts: 324
This impressive study knocking at the college door
breaks the graduating seniors stats up by region, state and graduating year.

In a nutshell, if you are white it is slightly better, if your asian/hispanic it gets
worse etc. It is much worse in the south and then the West compared to
the Northeast etc..

Its a huge report ...enjoy!
MIT 012 is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 10:01 PM   #21
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 312
The class of '08 was one of the smallest, and the class of '10 is the largest by far. The class of '09 is however the most competitive (oh no!)
chinnychinchang is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 04:47 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,469
Hope more c/o 2010ers smoke more pot so I have less people to worry about.
aisgzdavinci is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 06:02 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 195
08 and 09 should be where it peaks
kartrider360 is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 06:23 AM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CAMBRIDGE, MA, USA
Posts: 324
Post #23 is mostly correct.

In a number of states '07-'08 was when the # of graduating white
seniors peaked ([url=http://www.wiche.edu/Policy/Knocking/1992-2022/data.asp] see this link to the data [/ul]).

The combination of different ethinicity/race numbers might dealy the
peak in some states to next year or one year after but this matters
only if you put down "race unknown".

you should be considering what you put down as your
group/ethinicity/race (if any) and see what happens with
the trend?

Last edited by MIT 012; 07-24-2008 at 06:28 AM.
MIT 012 is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:31 PM   #25
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 776
The number of high school graduates peaked nationally in 2008 and will be down just slightly in 2009 and 2010---not enough of a change at that scale to affect college admissions. But regional and state-by-state changes are more complicated. High school graduates will be down in the Northeast and Midwest, generally up in the Southeast, and mixed in the West, with some states down sharply and others showing explosive growth. Especially notable is that non-Hispanic whites---the group statistically most likely to attend college---will be down quite significantly in many parts of the Northeast and Midwest, possibly enough to affect college admissions for colleges that draw their student bodies principally from those regions.

But other trends could offset this. I don't have data to prove it, by my impression is that in response to an increasingly competitive college admissions environment, students are applying to more colleges now than in the past, thereby amplifying the competitiveness. Also, online applications coupled with widespread use of the Common Application has simplified the application process, making it easier for students to apply to more colleges. Bottom line, it's hard to see any significant change one way or the other at the HYPS level, but most colleges and universities still draw primarily from a regional applicant pool, and competitive pressure at schools in some parts of the Northeast and Midwest may ease just a bit over the next few yewars.
bclintonk is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:40 PM   #26
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sooooooooo cal
Posts: 369
'08 and '09 are by far more competitive for us than for '10ers. These two years are going to break a LOT of records.
stockguru92 is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:47 PM   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 207
why? what caused this? besides, I know a lot of '09s and '10s and the '10s are definitely ALOT better
u§ername is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 01:47 PM   #28
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: edge of somewhere
Posts: 183
surprisingly, my year (09) is the least competitive compared to 08 and 10. 08 had, by far, the smartest people. They won academic competitions left and right (1st place national) and many people NOT in the top 10 went to ivy league schools, whereas that never occured before. Even though they were smart, not many of them ended up in top tier schools, opting out for state schools etc.
ticktock is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 02:35 PM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 87
omg this is kind of weird.
exactly same at my school.
not only is the class of 2009 the smartest class (based on average unweighted gpa) it is also the largest my school has ever had.
ilovepeople712 is offline  
Old 07-24-2008, 02:35 PM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Coastal Los Angeles
Posts: 1,186
There are two separate inputs here:

1) # of students graduating high school
2) % of graduating students applying to 4 year colleges

even if the first measure peaks for HS graduates of 2009, the number of college applicants can still go up each year because a higher % will be applying to college.

I do not expect to see the # of applicants to top 200 schools EVER going down. I think the % increase in applicants to college will result in more students than any reduction in # of HS graduates.
DunninLA is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 PM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0