| | |  | |
03-10-2008, 10:24 AM
|
#76 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: US Gender: Male
Threads: 10
Posts: 742
| The "awesomebar" (that's the nickname for it...) sucks, get the oldbar extension to restore the addressbar from FF1/FF2.
If I'm reading this correctly, after user protest Mozilla decided to hide the home button only when your Bookmarks are open on the left side for Firefox 3 Beta 4. If you don't have bookmarks open, from FF3b4 on it should display the home button as it was. |
| |
03-10-2008, 10:26 AM
|
#77 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: US Gender: Male
Threads: 10
Posts: 742
| Ugh, I'm trying IE8B1 in a Virtual machine. It's unusable. Cool design tweaks, but this isn't a Google style "beta by name only"; it has bugs to work out. But it is a beta and it does pass the Acid2 Browser Standards Compliance test, so Microsoft has definitely made progress. |
| |
03-15-2008, 11:48 PM
|
#78 | | New Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Threads: 3
Posts: 23
| Thank you Coop. Yeah, everything seems to be working fine now in beta 4. They changed the navigation arrow and made it lot better than beta 3. The awesome bar was anything but awesome, lol. |
| |
03-21-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#79 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Threads: 7
Posts: 59
| The search in beta 4 is a bit buggy.
And talking about IE.
If i took 4x hours to install IE, i have only used it for x hours. |
| |
04-01-2008, 07:49 PM
|
#80 | | Member
Join Date: May 2007 Location: 14°35′N 121°0′E Gender: Unknown
Threads: 82
Posts: 919
| OPERA is the best!!!! |
| |
04-03-2008, 05:19 PM
|
#81 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Threads: 196
Posts: 631
| I'm using firefox 3 beta 5,now. doesn't use as much memory as 2.0.It's aesthetically pleasing,too.much more than firefox 2.0,unless you have add ons.
ie is horrible. don't use it. |
| |
04-06-2008, 02:50 PM
|
#82 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: New Hampshire Gender: Male
Threads: 2
Posts: 487
| Coopjust wrote:
> Images, FF3 and IE7 are on par.
I just ran my jpeg suite against IE and it came in at 6407 milliseconds. FF 3.0 Beta 5 came in at 4076 milliseconds. |
| |
04-06-2008, 02:52 PM
|
#83 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: New Hampshire Gender: Male
Threads: 2
Posts: 487
| The technical details on the Firefox memory improvements in FF3 are at pavlov.net |
| |
04-09-2008, 01:52 PM
|
#84 | | New Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 12
| Firefox is worlds better than IE for many, many reasons
I am a user than usually has 10+ tabs open, and firefox handles a large amount of tabs much better (and faster) than IE
The design is very simple, and you don't need to install a million different toolbars to have it the way you like it
One of my favorite features is how you can add multiple search engines to the top right search box
IE may have some (or all, I haven't even used IE in over a year, so I have no idea what the current feature set is), but firefox is a better, faster, more secure browser. One of the best features is how it installs updates on the fly, quickly. Once every couple of weeks, I will get an install update window when I first open firefox, but within less than 10 seconds it is installed and I am at my home page
To each his own; but for me personally, I prefer firefox |
| |
04-13-2008, 01:35 PM
|
#85 | | New Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Threads: 1
Posts: 22
| I use firefox. The real power of FF is that you can easily add extensions to it. I added:
(1) CusomizeGoogle, which removes google ads;
(2) forecastfox, which lets you see the weather;
(3) greasemonkey, which lets you load javascripts. one script removes facebook ads. |
| |
04-28-2008, 03:14 AM
|
#86 | | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Threads: 0
Posts: 24
| FF3. It takes care of the high memory usage. Even the beta is very stable. I use it as my primary browser. My current number is about 120k with 16 tabs and open for 4 hours+. Not bad... but IE sucks. But what can you expect, its from M$. |
| |
04-28-2008, 05:04 PM
|
#87 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Threads: 2
Posts: 393
| @apoptosis2003:
Don't forget Adblock Plus ;/ |
| |
05-02-2008, 09:42 AM
|
#88 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Bangalore (no, seriously) Gender: Unknown
Threads: 19
Posts: 1,203
| Firefox or Safari. |
| |
05-02-2008, 01:29 PM
|
#89 | | Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Threads: 15
Posts: 523
| IE7 and firefox is on par in terms of security so both of them or OK. I personally will choose firefox 3.0 once it comes out. I heard they revamped the memory management and has fewer memory leaks than 2.0. Also if you are somewhat care about security don't ever use safari. Safari is the most insecure web browser from what I've learned in class. |
| |
05-18-2008, 09:30 PM
|
#90 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 8
Posts: 30
| FireFox, no doubt. |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM. |