| | |  | |
10-29-2009, 01:22 AM
|
#1 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
| Ti 89 vs TI Nspire
I want to pass down my TI 84 to my younger bro and get a new calculator
Which should I get??
Or does anyone recommend a Sharp, Casio, or HP calculator??
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 01:00 AM
|
#2 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 745
|
You should get a TI-83+. The signing key has been cracked, so soon enough it will be possible to run all manner of software on the 83, including the CAS from the 89 & the Nspire.
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 02:27 AM
|
#3 | | New Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16
|
Wouldn't the Ti 83's relatively slow processor render running many ti 89/nspire apps useless? ._.
I personally have a ti89, and love it. I heard the Nspire has a "testing mode" button, where an LED lights up, and locks you out of programs. Might want to do a little research on that.
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 09:39 PM
|
#4 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
|
Hmmm....
I have heard some issues with Nspire
anyone else?
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 10:45 PM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 745
| Quote: |
Wouldn't the Ti 83's relatively slow processor render running many ti 89/nspire apps useless?
| I'm sure the CAS would run just fine. I suppose some 3D stuff might run slower, but that's about it.
|
| Reply
|
10-30-2009, 11:36 PM
|
#6 | | Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 60
|
89 definitely. I've had mine for three years, precal to cal BC, and it's invaluable. Nspire is mainly for show.
|
| Reply
|
10-31-2009, 11:32 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,709
| Quote: |
I'm sure the CAS would run just fine. I suppose some 3D stuff might run slower, but that's about it.
| I would just check before a test how long different things take just so that you don't enter something and lose your calculator for 10 minutes.
|
| Reply
|
11-01-2009, 11:41 AM
|
#8 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,690
|
My only comment, since I know nothing about the Nspire, is whether it's allowed in tests. Some versions I think are considered small computers, not calculators.
|
| Reply
|
11-01-2009, 04:47 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,709
|
Most tests will have the same policy for the Nspire and 89, though some might let you take the Nspire in if it has the 84 cover. I doubt there are many tests that allow you to take the 89 in but not the Nspire.
|
| Reply
|
11-01-2009, 06:08 PM
|
#10 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
|
well, tests are not an issue cuz I'm planning to use it for college
|
| Reply
|
11-01-2009, 07:48 PM
|
#11 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,709
|
Then it doesn't really matter what type of calculator you get - you won't use it much.
|
| Reply
|
11-06-2009, 03:48 AM
|
#12 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 759
|
what will you be using this calculator for? im in college right now, and i rarely have a use for mine.
|
| Reply
|
11-07-2009, 12:20 AM
|
#13 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
|
well, just to tell you what kind of person I am...
I am someone who programs apps in my TI 84 just for fun.
And I am someone who like to use a good amount of features in calculators
ex) When I do a dot product, I will actually create a matrix and get a determinant
|
| Reply
|
11-07-2009, 04:09 AM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,709
|
but dot products aren't solved by determinants..
|
| Reply
|
11-08-2009, 07:09 AM
|
#15 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Berkeley '12
Posts: 398
|
I'd just get another 84+. They're fast and reliable. This is after using many 83s, and owning both 84+ and 89. I've looked at the nSpire, and that seems to be a bloated mess that comes with neither the reliability of the 84+ or the roboustness of the 89.
Thing is, the 89 is more like a PDA and has a built in CAS, along with a nicer interface. The nSpire functions much more like a 84+.
Considering that you're posting here, I'm assuming you're going into college. As a tentative math major, my experience is that the more advanced you get, the less calculator you will need. In fact, ever since AP Calculus BC, I haven't needed anything more than a scientific calculator (though, to be honest, I stuck with a 84+ since it is an awesome scientific calculator with lots of extras that I never use, like graphing). After getting done with multivariable and finishing all my physical science classes, I haven't laid a finger on a calculator; not even a four-function calculator.
Thing is, calculators are for arithmetic, not for real math. Keep that in mind - a 84+ is cheap, rugged, and will do all that you will ever need to do, unless your are truly incompetent at math and remain that way.
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM. |