College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Confidential Community > College Confidential Cafe
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-10-2008, 10:22 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Threads: 69
Posts: 588
Abstinence-Only vs. Comprehensive Sex-Ed

Which one is better in your opinion? I think there needs to be an overhaul on Ab-Only, but I don't think it's entirely bad. That said, how do you guys feel?
jaso9n2 is offline  
Old 05-10-2008, 10:58 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: P-Town, where the ballas Ball
Threads: 76
Posts: 4,320
who cares?

nobody I know ever cares about anything that is ever said by anyone else besides their own friends. Basically in health class say use condoms and talk to them about stds and that's it..anything else is just a waste of money.
Sheed30 is offline  
Old 05-10-2008, 10:58 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Gender: Female
Threads: 63
Posts: 881
they're going to find out anyway. it's better they learn the whole truth than some corrupted secondhand version of it.
fizix2 is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 10:09 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Paffleton, Florida --> MIT '12
Gender: Male
Threads: 9
Posts: 488
Pffft..we should experiment with this instead :P

and see which group has the higher pregnancy rate...then we won't need this debate (I know, unethical...)
TritiumKnight is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 11:40 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Threads: 15
Posts: 1,482
hasn't such a study already been done? It obviously wasn't a prospective because as you said, it's unethical, but I'm pretty sure people with abstinence-only sex ed have a higher pregnancy rate than people with more comprehensive sex ed.
This is kind of old
http://ari.ucsf.edu/science/reports/abstinence.pdf
But here is a very recent one
Skyscape: MedAlert: Mobile medical references for Palm, Pocket PC, PDA, Tablet PC, Windows Mobile and Smartphone.
this is interesting too:
Oral sex lessons to cut rates of teenage pregnancy | UK news | The Observer
i_wanna_be_Brown is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:02 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Gender: Unsure
Threads: 12
Posts: 613
I cannot understand, for the life of me, how any human being being can have experienced hormones and still believe in the effectiveness of abstinence-only education. How is that possible? What are these people on?
jack4640 is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:05 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Threads: 23
Posts: 253
skool of hard knoks, beetchiz. yoo goda lurn it on da streetz
imaparasite is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 03:34 PM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: dlvl19, stalking leocrotta
Gender: Unsure
Threads: 8
Posts: 119
and by "on da streetz" you mean "in your $1.4 million home in the Minneapolis ghetto"

Last edited by Pyroclasm : 05-11-2008 at 03:39 PM.
Pyroclasm is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 05:41 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Gender: Female
Threads: 23
Posts: 253
strayed up, foo
imaparasite is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 05:55 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Threads: 133
Posts: 1,459
I really doubt the fact that teenage pregnancies occur at such as high rate has much to do with lack of sex ed. I mean: I never even took sex ed and know how you get pregnant and all that stuff.

Rather, I think teenage pregnancies have much to do with the fact that the partakers do not fully understand the consequences/do not worry about the consequences. When you're 16 and have 2 babies but get free education and other services, why worry about the consequences? You can live a life of risks without having to feel the full results of your consequences.
afruff23 is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 06:46 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Suffragette City
Threads: 73
Posts: 1,627
You people make me curl up my fists and hit pillows.

My ghetto public school has abstinence-only. They tell you that STDs are inevitable and condoms are eh. I can estimate that more than 90% of my class doesn't know the basic anatomy of their own bodies. Yeah, they know where to put what where, but that doesn't mean they know everything else. They honestly think using mountain dew and the rhythm technique works.

It's simple ignorance. Nobody tells them so they don't know. You think, Oh, open a book, learn the consequences, it isn't that difficult. Yes, it is. Because they don't know that they can do that. Jesus says don't do it, and that's all they need to know.

Quote:
I really doubt the fact that teenage pregnancies occur at such as high rate has much to do with lack of sex ed.
Seriously. Seriously. Think about what I just said. If teenagers were given comprehensive sex education along with knowledge of exactly what they are risking, do you think there would be the same rate of teenage pregnancy? Yeah, some don't care, but they do later.

Teenagers are going to do it whether the Man likes it or not. You might as well teach them how to use a condom.
snoopyiscool is online now  
Old 05-11-2008, 07:04 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 4
Posts: 31
I completely agree with snoopy. I think I can safely say that most teens don't know whats out there in terms of birth control. Or how you can get it without telling your parents.

It's so much better to be able to choose to have safe sex. And when they show you pictures of herpes and genital warts, you won't want to take any risks.
anna5631 is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 07:53 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Threads: 133
Posts: 1,459
Everybody says that they don't think teens are knowledgeable about birth control and related topics, but do you really believe that? You don't think people have heard of condoms? I think that's pretty arrogant to assume.

It has more to do with lack of foresight and lack of facing consequences (see my example in my previous post).
afruff23 is offline  
Old 05-11-2008, 07:58 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Suffragette City
Threads: 73
Posts: 1,627
...Because they don't know. How are they supposed to know about the effectiveness of birth control if no one tells them? Yeah, they've heard of condoms, but the majority of people I know have no idea how effective they are. They think they "get in the way". Yes, lack of foresight, but lack of foresight due to ignorance.

Sigh.
snoopyiscool is online now  
Old 05-11-2008, 08:41 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Gender: Unsure
Threads: 12
Posts: 613
Teenagers are horny and stupid. Just give them condoms and stand back, jesus christ it's not hard.
jack4640 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0