College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Confidential Community > College Confidential Cafe

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-02-2008, 12:19 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 253
well if we dont kill the poor, what will we eat in 20 years after global warming ravages the earth
TomHirschfeld is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 12:22 AM   #17
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 19
Why would you choose a lifeboat though?
Survival isn't necessarily a zero-sum game- its not if they win, we lose.

What about investing in technological research and medical research, and hoping that changes the situation?
Or providing population control advice- etc.
cornell.2012 is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 04:50 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,473
there is enough food to go around, it's just that it's being sent to the wrong places. I think what that Hardin guy wanted to say is that they must eliminate mentally ill people.
aisgzdavinci is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 04:51 AM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 752
what. a. jerk.
azsxdc is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 05:35 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,473
Wait, that article is WAY outdated. India with a pop of 600 million????
aisgzdavinci is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 08:03 AM   #21
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 479
Of course it's "outdated"! Hardin died in 2003 at 81! He wrote this way back. In the 70s I believe.


Please tell me you guys have studied Hardin at one point or another. Human Geo? TOK? Literature? Philosophy???
MetdethGNR is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 09:07 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,237
The basic metaphor is false. The United States is riding on a giant luxury lifeboat that could easily accomodate more people--thousands upon thousands more. But it would mean giving up some measure of comfort and space to help them, and we don't want to do that.

If anybody should die, it should be that dude.
southeasttitan is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 09:21 AM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,528
Or we should just stop outbreeding dead people and let everyone naturally die off.
Liist is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 10:21 AM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 98
Umm we(the u.s) actually DON'T have room for ''thousands and thousands more'' our economy is in a major slump and a global recession is almost certain in the near future.I totally agree with Hardin.If we bring in more people,they need a way to suppost themselves(jobs) well as it is now millions are being laid off because their jobs are being sent elsewhere or being eliminated all together.since febuary alone over 63,000 jobs have been lost.and with our 'open door policy' more immigrants are willing to work for less money,further eliminating more jobs. When we enter recession its going to the worst since ww2.

And for the poster(I forgot) who said the poor stay poor.your right our govt is more of a capitalist govt than a socialist or communist.the ones in power(usually born into it) want to stay in power.
ali_mayhem is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 12:08 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by ali_mayhem
your right our govt is more of a capitalist govt than a socialist or communist.the ones in power(usually born into it) want to stay in power.
And do you think this is okay? "Life isn't fair"? That's arguable -- I'm not saying either answer is wrong; I just want to know what you think. Do you think that in an ideal situation the number of people below the poverty line would be fewest, or do you think that things are okay how they are?
Poseur is offline  
Old 07-02-2008, 12:57 PM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 98
^^ I don't think it's fair.i think it's BS.I think in an idea situation ,people below the poverty line would be few.things are def not ok how they are obv. But our government is so corrupt and worried about other countries and not what's happening here. However I also do not think TRUE communism would work either.even though True communist never has/will be in existance.I think you need an equal balnce but in the past few decades capitalism has taken over.I think as a country we should help each other and use our right to overthrow a govt when they fail you.and no im not sayiing 'its all bush's falt' a lot of the things happening now have been in a rolling effect since the late 80's(although he didn't help & is a quack lol)......sorry so long hehe
ali_mayhem is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 10:33 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,237
"Umm we(the u.s) actually DON'T have room for ''thousands and thousands more'' our economy is in a major slump and a global recession is almost certain in the near future.I totally agree with Hardin.If we bring in more people,they need a way to suppost themselves(jobs) well as it is now millions are being laid off because their jobs are being sent elsewhere or being eliminated all together.since febuary alone over 63,000 jobs have been lost.and with our 'open door policy' more immigrants are willing to work for less money,further eliminating more jobs. When we enter recession its going to the worst since ww2."

I don't mean ACTUALLY letting them into the country, I mean letting them into the figurative lifeboat of privilege. Like, maybe stop spending upwards of a trillion dollars on a worthless war and giving the help and resources to people--in our country and outside of it--who need it.
southeasttitan is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 10:47 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,281
I agree. When my friend challenged the feasibility of large-scale social reform aimed at eliminating poverty, he asked me where the government would get the money. I said that I wouldn't mind taking a couple billion out of our armament funds, to which he replied: "True... I wouldn't mind cutting it in half."
Poseur is offline  
Old 07-09-2008, 01:35 AM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 60
I think the author should be deprived of food for two weeks.
football is offline  
Old 07-09-2008, 03:28 AM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The flight line
Posts: 114
The planet will balance itself soon enough, just like it has for the past 3 or so billion years there's been life on it. Too many people on it? Hang tight, some epic disaster will sort everything out in due time.
Panglossian is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0