| OPINION: Which version is better?
Hi! I have two (well actually three) versions of my essay. One is more captivating, yet it does not follow the rules of an essay structure/order as well as it should (i.e. Intro, thesis, body, conclusion... instead mine is BIG BANG, thesis, body, conclusion). The other is very formal, but I think it lacks that 'something extra' that will make them interested in reading my essay. The last one is kind of a morph between the two: I start off with something captivating, but cut it off to lead into a traditional introductory. I then resume my captivating story-telling in the 2nd paragraph.
I don't want to come off as being drab and boring... but I also don't want to come off like I can't adhere to the rules of writing a cohesive essay.
Which do you think is best?
|