College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > Professional & Graduate School > Graduate School
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-15-2006, 08:24 PM   #61
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Threads: 19
Posts: 641
My take is that the Shiangtao (sp) list, in it of itself, is a lot better.
felipecocco is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 08:26 PM   #62
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Threads: 15
Posts: 812
We are discussing Newsweek, sorry
halopeno2 is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 08:30 PM   #63
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Threads: 19
Posts: 641
right... and in their methodolgy they explain that they used part of two rankings to compile their own... and my contention is that either of those two lists -- by themselves -- is better than this mix-mash. So, I AM discussing NEWSWEEK
felipecocco is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 08:34 PM   #64
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Threads: 15
Posts: 812
Oh ok, I don't know what the Shiangtao list is but I'd be happy to argue about it with you!
halopeno2 is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 08:40 PM   #65
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Threads: 19
Posts: 641
http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm
felipecocco is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 08:41 PM   #66
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Threads: 15
Posts: 812
All rankings are rediculous. I can't think of a practical application for them!
halopeno2 is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 08:58 PM   #67
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 29
Posts: 2,476
Practical use for college rankings: "You are a complete failure as a human being because your alma mater ranked 3 spots below mine on the 'Best College Logo' list in the magazine 'Embroidery Monthly.'"
TourGuide446 is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 09:07 PM   #68
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Threads: 7
Posts: 224
All ranking lists have value if done carefully. The important thing to remember is that they highlight different characteristics which are more appropriate for different audiences.

The USNews plays to the mostly US applicants to undergrad.

The Newsweek/Shanghai/Times lists apply heavily to foreigners who are applying to grad school (mostly Phd).

While I don't agree with their specific choice of weights (I think Shanghai is the best of the 3) these lists are helpful to foreigners who often have no good info in their home countries about US schools and often rely on word of mouth which is less reliable still. Foreign students are a huge minority -- sometimes majority -- of grad students in technical fields such as engineering, science, econ, math, business, medicine. So they (esp Shanghai) chose weights which reflect this demand.

Moreover, many of the things that undergrads value -- sports, social atmosphere, extracurricular activities, summers abroad -- are nearly useless or irrelevant in a grad context. Except for Law/MBA you'll probably find that all that "balance" that helped get you into a great undergrad program will mean diddly for helping you enter and succeed in PhD programs.

Foreign students understand this and are trained for this. That is why they are often better prepared than Americans to do graduate work in technical fields unless the Americans took the most heavily mathematical workload possible.
Not quite old is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 09:09 PM   #69
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cambridge, MA
Threads: 0
Posts: 28
Does anybody know of any rankings where Harvard was not on the top?
I am beginning to hate Harvard for it being Harvard.
ConfidentialCLG is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 09:11 PM   #70
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Threads: 105
Posts: 2,153
Yes, in terms of undergraduate education quality, Caltech and Yale beat out Harvard.
posterX is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 09:13 PM   #71
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northwestern University '08 -> Harvard
Threads: 9
Posts: 2,201
Do you have any way to back up that statement?
kk19131 is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 09:14 PM   #72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northwestern University '08 -> Harvard
Threads: 9
Posts: 2,201
"All ranking lists have value if done carefully."

- So pretty much only rankings with which you agree, right?
kk19131 is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 09:16 PM   #73
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: new jersey
Threads: 28
Posts: 479
Quote:
Yes, in terms of undergraduate education quality, Caltech and Yale beat out Harvard.
That would depend on what you're studying. If you wanted pre-med, would you really choose CalTech over Hahfurd?
phroz3n is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 10:27 PM   #74
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 17
Posts: 43
Umass

UMASS at Amherst
specialed is offline  
Old 08-15-2006, 10:28 PM   #75
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: smalltown, MA
Threads: 36
Posts: 966
lol yea, just thinking that...
GIMEurSTRESballZ is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0