College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > College Search & Selection
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-17-2006, 10:44 AM   #121
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 2,144
Aren't schools like Mich, Cal, UVA at least 65% in-state students?

I guess it's what your definition of better undergraduate education is. I wouldn't have wanted to be in large classes taught by TAs.
gellino is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 11:49 AM   #122
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Threads: 54
Posts: 3,768
gellino- in fall of 1999 (when i was applying to schools), conn coll was ranked 25. in 2006, the usnews ranking was 36. which is why the usnews rankings need to be taken with more than a few grains of salt- how does a school drop that much that fast!
huskem55 is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 12:16 PM   #123
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, Lynchburg, VA
Gender: Male
Threads: 715
Posts: 7,655
Gellino--get educated--TA's do not teach large lecture classes at any major ranked university. They lead the small 15-20 student hour long weekly discussion sections and grade class work and tests. The only classes they will actually lead teach are small intro level math, English Comp., and foreign language classes. the class size is usually under 25 for those classes.
barrons is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 12:47 PM   #124
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 2,144
That's not the impression I've gotten of friends that have gone on to grad schools at big state schools.

"Harvard, MIT, Princeton, Stanford and Yale are the only research universities in the nation that offer better undergraduate education than Cal, Michigan and UVa. Outside of a select few on this forum, most of the highly educated world agrees with that."

If this were true in the case of Michigan and people actually believed this, I would think their admit rate would be way lower than 57%.
gellino is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 01:09 PM   #125
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: www.theonion.com
Threads: 111
Posts: 4,020
^Agreed

If that was true, the children of most of the highly educated world would be wanting to attend Cal, Mich, and UVA as much as they'd like to attend Penn, Columia, Duke, Brown, and Cornell.
thethoughtprocess is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 01:12 PM   #126
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, Lynchburg, VA
Gender: Male
Threads: 715
Posts: 7,655
Maybe you need to ask more detailed questions. All I ever saw TA's do in large lecture was hand out notes and assignments and take attendance.
barrons is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 01:34 PM   #127
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Threads: 35
Posts: 650
If you're seriously going to base your perception of schools off of admission rates, then you're just like the rest of the idiots out there who only go for schools based on name prestige.
jakem333 is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 01:36 PM   #128
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 2,144
I guess I didn't ask more questions because I wasn't interested in attending one those schools. However, I did have a couple friends in PhD programs at Big 10 schools and from their description it sure sounded like they were teaching undergrad classes.
gellino is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 01:46 PM   #129
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 2,144
Admission rate is certainly an important consideration. After all, similar to the stock market, the college admissions market is, at least, pretty close to efficient. People seem to follow USN&WR rankings like gospel so much that other publications haven't been able to sprout up and compete like in the MBA rankings and it uses admission rate as a main criteria; so there has to be some merit behind it. I'm not saying it should be the only or even main consideration and it should be combined with factors like location, size, environment, etc, but cannot be ignored.
gellino is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 02:08 PM   #130
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, Lynchburg, VA
Gender: Male
Threads: 715
Posts: 7,655
Even among elite level students most will choose a college within close proximity to home. Thus the market is far from efficient and schools in large population centers will have more applicants and more selectivity.
barrons is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 02:39 PM   #131
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 2,144
It is true that many students will choose schools close to home, but was taking these types of factors into account when saying the market was efficient. Maybe the market is "in equilibrium" would be a better descripition of what I was trying to convey.

Still, I would think a lot higher % of students in the top 5% of their hs classes in location-neutral states like CO, MO, FL, GA would be attracted to Brown and Dartmouth before UMich and UVA. It would be interesting to compare what the acceptance rates from students from these four states to these four schools would be.
gellino is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 03:01 PM   #132
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Threads: 164
Posts: 11,441
Gellino, TA do not usually teach at most major universities, be it Harvard or Michigan. They may teach intro to Calculus or 101 of a Foreign Language, but that's the extent of it. For the most part, TAs assist professors with leading small discussion sections and with some of the grading.

As for % accepted, it is meaningless. You will one day realize that when you are older. What matters is the quality of the student body. Like I said, people in the know will not rate a private elite over a public elite.
Alexandre is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 04:44 PM   #133
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Threads: 767
Posts: 1,708
Everyone has been doing the top top colleges so I figure I'll go more along the middle schools.

Underrated- U. Nebraska, U. Iowa, University of Minnesota, U. Maryland.
Overrated- Boston College, Miami (OH), Bentley College


Indiana was underrated, but class of 2010 seems to have caught on to that.
kinglin is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 04:49 PM   #134
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Orleans
Threads: 9
Posts: 347
bentley college, miami (oh) overrated? haha who is rating these colleges highly? i surely have never heard anyone promoting bentley college.

underrated: washington and lee, davidson, tulane
overrated: georgetown, brown, JHU
pirt8528 is offline  
Old 05-17-2006, 05:15 PM   #135
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 2,144
If % accepted is meaningless, then why is USN&WR using it as a main component in its ranking and why are colleges sprinting to out-do each other in reporting what % of applicants were accepted literally within days of the letters initially being sent out to candidates?

I would guess that if you run a regression of acceptance rate vs. avg SAT, % in top 10% of class or any other measure of student quality you want to use that you will get a high R-squared. It would be an interesting study and probably one that has already been done somewhere.

Having attended a top 15 LAC, top 10 business school (not UMich), and having worked on Wall St. for about a decade, I feel I would be in your self-created "in the know". From what I have seen at the companies I've worked for as far as recruiting has been a clear bias towards mostly private colleges. In fact, now that I think about it, at the two hedge funds I've worked for, there were only two people from public schools (both UVA) out of the ~ 25 people I worked with. They were both great people who I enjoyed working with, I'm just saying that your statement that top public and top private schools being treated equally and "everyone in the know" thinks so, I have not seen so far in my career at all. If anything, I have come to appreciate the merits of the top private schools more after joining the working world than I did out of high school. A lot of it to me just comes down to personal preference and ambition, but certain schools will certainly make the road tougher to hoe than others.
gellino is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0