| | |  | |
01-13-2009, 09:16 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 1,232
|
"Interesting that the only two SEC publics that can compete nationally happen to be in the two states most culturally affected by northern transplants. Just saying..."
I completely agree. Oh no I don't because I can't think of a public school in:
*New york
*Massachusetts
*New Jersey
*Maine
*Vermont
*New Hampshire
*Connecticut
*Delaware
that is as good as Florida or Georgia. The one public in Pennsylvania that can even come close, Penn State (possibly Pitt), has an almost open admissions undergrad school and is lacking in undergraduate student aptitude, as a whole. Ironically, these states have some of the highest taxes and certainly tax more than Florida (with NO state income tax) or Georgia. Way to set the standard, Norrthern States- Tax more and produce lower quality.
But hey......you can still be right LOL!
Last edited by tomslawsky; 01-13-2009 at 09:22 PM.
|
| Reply
|
01-13-2009, 11:16 PM
|
#17 | | Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,179
|
^ Well, let's at least get our facts straight. US News, which ranks Penn State ahead of both Florida and Georgia in its overall rankings, reports that Penn State had a 51.0% acceptance rate in 2007---slightly lower than Georgia's 54.3% and not too far behind Florida's 42.1%. And those Penn State undergrads so "lacking in aptitude"? Well, their middle 50% SATs of 1090-1300 are actually quite comparable to Florida's 1140-1360 and Georgia's 1130-1310. So if Penn State students as a whole are "lacking in aptitude", then presumably so are the 90% + of students at Florida and Georgia who enter with comparable stats.
But why so selective in your choice of northern states, tomslawsky? What about the fact that the state flagships of Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Pennsylvania ALL outrank Florida in the US News rankings? What about the fact that all these, plus Ohio State and Maryland ALL outrank Georgia---with Pitt, the #2 state university in Pennsylvania, tied with Georgia? Or what about the fact that EVERY Big Ten school outranks EVERY SEC public university except Florida and Georgia---as do Pitt, Rutgers, and the Universities of Maryland, Connecticut, Delaware, and SUNY Binghamton?
Hmmm . . . mayb e you DO get what you pay for.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 12:17 AM
|
#18 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 93
|
Here is my list from the "Ranking the D1 Schools" thread. I live in Georgia, and next year I am attending Georgia Tech, in the ACC. That being said, I'm a huge Tech fan (and somewhat of a Florida fan) and I hate the Georgia Bulldogs. But I still respect that UGA is a very competitive, selective, highly-ranked academic institution.
Vandy
Florida
Georgia
Tennessee
Alabama
Auburn
South Carolina
Kentucky
Ole Miss
LSU
Miss. State
Arkansas
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 12:55 AM
|
#19 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Places
Posts: 942
|
I thought this would be about the Securities and Exchange Commission. I'm such a nerd.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 09:02 AM
|
#20 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,266
|
"What about the fact that the state flagships of Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Pennsylvania ALL outrank Florida in the US News rankings?"
It's only going to be a matter of time for UF to catch up to Penn State, UIUC, and Wisconsin. Over 18 million people live in Florida, and the demand at UF is getting insane.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 09:38 AM
|
#21 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 48
|
Yeah, I don't think the Northern transplants are the driving force behind UGAs increasing quality. Instead, I'm going to point out the HOPE scholarship program, which provides free in-state tuition to any Georgia kid with a 3.0 high school GPA. This made college feasible for a HUGE number of Georgians. It also drove up demand for UGA because top kids who would have gone out of state (or to schools like Mercer, Emory, Vandy, etc) want to stay in-state and public for the free tuition. You can map UGAs increasing prestige to the implementation of the HOPE program.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 10:12 AM
|
#22 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 134
|
"SEC" and "academics" in the same sentence! Who knew?
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 10:18 AM
|
#23 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 134
|
Although I'm no fan of the SUNY system, some of the schools are quite decent. SUNY Geneseo's students, for example, have higher SAT scores than U Florida's students.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 11:36 AM
|
#24 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 832
|
Bclintonk, you beat me to it. I just the nonsense of tomslawsky's post. I am glad you pointed out how ridiculous it was. You saved me the time.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 11:46 AM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,582
|
Penn State is a better school than anything in the SEC, save Vanderbilt.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 11:51 AM
|
#26 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 832
|
I finally agree with rjkofnovi. The Big Ten is just much more of an academic conference, hence why Penn State is #5 in the Big Ten and would be #2 in the SEC.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 12:16 PM
|
#27 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 57
|
As for Florida's ranking. Yes, it has risen admirably over the last decade and a half, but that is not the complete picture.That half billion dollars in research would put it in the bottom third in the Big Ten. Ohio State by comparison did 3/4 billion dollars last year, and that was only good enough for 4th in the conference. Florida's endowment would put it in the bottom half of the Big Ten. Ohio State's is approaching 2 1/2 billion, and Michigan's is over 4. It still lags severely behind almost every Big Ten university in department rankings as well as key faculty indicators such as National Academy members, Guggenheim Fellows and AAAS Fellows. Given Florida's decision to balance its budget in large part on the backs of its state universities on top of already weak funding, I don't see Florida being able to catch up any time soon. Again, for all that rabid alumni support, they've only built up a mediocre--by Big Ten standards--endowment base.
I commend Florida for breaking out of the traditional SEC mold of football first and mediocre academics, but let's be realistic. Florida's rise in the USN&WR rankings is largely the product of Florida's demographics--i.e. way too many applicants for far too few spots. While it has come a long way, it has a lot further to go before it could truly compete with most Big Ten schools as a comprehensive national research university.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 12:52 PM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,184
|
"the nonsense of tomslawsky's post."
The main reason the post is silly is that the Northeast's public schools suffer brain drain to its legions of outstanding private schools. There's a centuries-old private school tradition in those states. That's not the case in the SEC states. UF really has no in-state competition at the elite level; UGA has some, but it can't compare to the in-state options available in MA, NY, etc.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 01:18 PM
|
#29 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,600
|
^I saw the same thing. Thanks for saying it for me.
tomslawsky,
You forgot SUNY , which is more selective than UF/UGA (please don't post the scores for "admitted" students to argue). Are UF/UGA better than Rutgers? That's debatable. Now, I am not aware of any good privates in the state of Florida and that seems pathetic for a state that large.
|
| Reply
|
01-14-2009, 01:48 PM
|
#30 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 828
|
I think many of the Big-10 schools are absolutely wonder research universities...I have the opportunity to recruit at many of them. But do not sell UF short on the research front...I think they actually out-rank all the Big-10, except for Michigan, if terms of patents awarded and technology transfer-to-market.
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM. |