Welcome to College Confidential, the leading college-bound community on the Web!
Here you'll find hundreds of pages of articles about choosing a college, getting into the college you want, how to pay for it, and much more.
You'll also find the Web's busiest discussion community related to college admissions, and our College Visits section!
You are currently viewing the site as a guest.
Registration is simple and easy, and provides full site access.
I would call 33% increase a radical difference. For example, it's 800 instead of 600 (200 more), 1,600 instead of 1,200 (400 more), 2,400 instead of 1,800 (600 more).
or 120 instead of 90, or even 40 instead of 30. Depends on how you look at it.
EDIT
actually those percentages mean nothing anyways, it's a difference in numbers, taken out of different-sized applicant pools. 2% of the freshman pool might be more like 20% of the transfer applicant pool. :-).
I would call 33% increase a radical difference. For example, it's 800 instead of 600 (200 more), 1,600 instead of 1,200 (400 more), 2,400 instead of 1,800 (600 more).
I didn't think about it when I wrote it and just tossed out some numbers. Realistically it would be something more like 6% to 7%. Regular decision is effing tough either way. But either way good luck to your son/daughter. I'd be stoked to get in next year.
Hey. So there are more chances of getting in by applying Early-Decision right?
I really want to go to Columbia University forever now and was so bummed to hear the acceptance rates decreasing end that the peak is for Class of 2013 (which I am a part of)
I am applying early-decision and am really hoping it makes a difference.
Does anyone know for sure?
Since ED programs are binding, the general opinion is that you have a better chance applying early. Schools are all interested in their ability to enroll admitted students.