|
did you read what i wrote?
anyhow, your point is too rosy, and forgets the fact that there might be a correlation between those who desire to submit earlier (i.e. perfectionist, eager-beavers) and those that might submit at the deadline (less committed, not as interested).
but more broadly: i think it is naive to assume there is no subjectivity in this application process. just as the applicant's subjectivity is engaged (who they choose to recommend them, how they present themselves), you do realize that a human being is on the other end of it and not a machine? the admissions officer can consider everything and anything, from your bad handwriting to your misspelling of Colombia. it is not to say you must be perfect, but that depending on your reader, things will be read differently across universities and someone's pet peeve at one place could bring pause whereas at another school you are easily admitted. if someone reads your essay after they just read something similar - what could have been impressive does not stand out. of course there is some effort at standardized practices to prevent massive bias, but in the end you are dealing with humans. and our understanding of history being very linear, it is best to be the person that they read first than the one that has the weight of previous expectations.
so in my opinion when you submit the application matters. it not only says a lot about how you think about a school, but what if a reader just begins to wonder how committed you are to the school, or is curious about sloppy errors, perhaps they might wonder - when did the person submit this application? at 11:59? hmmm...
do you want an easy way to avoid that hmm? submit it earlier.
|