College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > Ivy League > Cornell University
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2006, 12:46 PM   #46
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Threads: 5
Posts: 247
No, that's not the way of interpreting the percentages. The correct inference would be: Harvard was preferred over Yale by 9 out 10 of the respondents.

But you are right, preference is based on many factors, and not only quality of education. In other words, Yale might offer the same or better education, but taking all other factors (e.g., location, weather, even sports teams) into consideration, most people would prefer attending Harvard.
goldtx is offline  
Old 10-07-2006, 01:23 PM   #47
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 97
What I am saying here or trying to say is that if most of the cross-admits decide against your school, how would your school attract the best student. I have no doubt nor challenge against the quality of education of each schools. But students in general, like what goldtx had mentioned, generally look beyond that when choosing school.
profanity is offline  
Old 10-07-2006, 11:24 PM   #48
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cornell University
Threads: 31
Posts: 4,032
"if most of the cross-admits decide against your school, how would your school attract the best student"

well, do you think that ONLY the 10% of the class that harvard accepts is qualified? Do you think that Yale could completely throw out the current class of 2010 and create a new class based on the same applicant pool that is just as qualified? Yes.
gomestar is offline  
Old 10-08-2006, 12:08 AM   #49
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Threads: 5
Posts: 247
Yes, there is enough pie to share.
goldtx is offline  
Old 10-08-2006, 02:23 AM   #50
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 97
i know... i understand that there is. but school that is more preferred would have gotten the 'first pick', which means that they get to select the slightly more qualified of the qualified. well..i am not v sure if that actually makes sense. in either case, i am sure there're ppl who're extremely qualified and were rejected. i hope you see the 'logic' behind what i am trying to say here.
profanity is offline  
Old 10-08-2006, 12:03 PM   #51
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: tn
Threads: 5
Posts: 581
i don't know how you can get to that POV profanity. getting into a very prestigious and competitive school is very much a crapshoot sometimes. there could be people whom you believe is not as qualified (based on grades, tests) who get in over someone who has better grades and tests. futhermore, because there are SOOO many great applicants, universities must sometimes choose based on the little things...a trombone player gets in because they don't have many as opposed to someone who plays the piano/violin (for example). because of things like this, you cannot say just because the majority decided to choose H over Y means that Y doesn't get as quality students as H.
quynh2007 is offline  
Old 11-05-2006, 07:32 PM   #52
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 11
some one should finish the saying - "Cornell is the easiest Ivy to get into, BUT THE HARDEST ONE TO GET OUT OF"
many people know that, and to me, knowing that i could succeed at the hardest Ivy league school in the country would make me feel pretty good regardless of any ranking
FrankieY is offline  
Old 11-06-2006, 11:01 PM   #53
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Threads: 24
Posts: 148
If we claim that upenn is much much much better than cornell, how come when we say, "i'm going to upenn" people either say:
-Oh is that the same as penn sate or
-Are you going to wharton?

In my opinion and from what i've read in critiques, upenn went up in rankins with "wharton as it's backbone" (quoting from i don't remember what article)

Putting that aside,
I don't know why: perhaps everyone in this country knows the 8 schools of the ivy league but when you go outside of this country (exculding Europe maybe), most people don't know the 8 schools of the ivy league. In fact when I was applying to clgs including penn and cornell, ppl say: Cornell, I know that school while penn: i've never heard of that school...And my friends including family friends are not some uneducated ppl rather ppl who are top executives of their companies.

Don't attack me...I'm merely expressing my point of view, not creating some battle between the ivy leagues or a fight like i did with one of the threads i made regarding statistics.

Cough cough...figgy i think ur aware of this
maryjulia75 is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 01:21 AM   #54
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Threads: 8
Posts: 22
cornell is also a LAND GRANT COLLEGE

three of the schools are state funded you idiots, obviously there's gonna be less selectivity there
chessgeeksam is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 05:59 AM   #55
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Threads: 14
Posts: 450
I find preference studies to be the most flawed of anything. I wouldn't want to choose an undergraduate experience based on what other high school kids think, especially when so many choose a school based on prestige.

Prestige is the type of PR thing that is self-perpetuating. Another school could be truely the "best" undergraduate in academics, quality of teachers, location, blah blah, but Harvard is so well known, has highest prestige, and believed to be the best that it doesn't have to do anything to be at the top of preference rankings except continue to reject the most students. It is so hard to get into, then it "must" be the "best," and kids desire even more to go there.
odyssey is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 08:26 AM   #56
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cornell University
Threads: 31
Posts: 4,032
MIT is also a land grand school.


for what it's worth, the state only funds a marginal amount of the total cost of a Cornell education. NYS pays about $12,000 of the $60,000 total estimated cost.
gomestar is offline  
Old 11-07-2006, 09:51 AM   #57
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Threads: 33
Posts: 2,540
Whyyy won'ttt thisss threaddd diiie? Leave it please...what good ever comes from this damn thread?
Figgy is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 08:52 AM   #58
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Threads: 17
Posts: 66
aside from wharton, penn is the easiest and worst ivy league.

sorry thats imo, you're welcome to state yours.

half the kids are legacy, seriously. and half of them are very one-tracked in the sense the school is so pre-professional. it does not stimulate an intellectual environment like for example brown, princeton, cornell, or even columbia.
ilovepeople712 is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 10:13 AM   #59
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Threads: 1
Posts: 184
Here's the problem with the logic that those saying Cornell is easiest to get into - you look at sheer numbers and not the quality of the applicant pools. Selectivity isn't just based on the percent of applicants admitted but the competition each applicant faces in being admitted. This however is something that can't be quantified thus people feel the need to just ignore it. Cornell has over 30000 applicants, meaning there is ridiculous competition to get into a lot of its colleges. Additionally, Cornell's methodology is a lot different from the other ivy league colleges because of its charter of inclusiveness. I'm not going to ramble on but I will conclude with this. Those who determine the quality of an institution by the percent of applicants admitted seriously have issues. Get beyond the numbers and you'll quickly realize just how sweet Cornell is.

One final plea - please stop making threads like this.
cornell2011 is offline  
Old 07-23-2008, 11:12 AM   #60
Kyt
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Threads: 7
Posts: 385
Stop necroing. This thread is from 2006.
Kyt is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0