| | |  | |
08-17-2007, 09:45 PM
|
#16 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Threads: 35
Posts: 316
| can you post the full rankings for Undergrad biomed engineering (You only posted up to #23)
Thanks a lot |
| |
08-18-2007, 05:29 PM
|
#17 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: AL
Threads: 15
Posts: 621
| So UC-Berkeley is a better engineering school that Cal Tech? Really? |
| |
08-18-2007, 05:31 PM
|
#18 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: AL
Threads: 15
Posts: 621
| It's also neat to see my school ranked. Yeah, it's right down there at the very bottom, but it's better than being unranked, right? |
| |
08-18-2007, 07:01 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Stanford
Threads: 19
Posts: 1,061
| So I compiled a list of the top four ranked engineering schools just for fun. Here it is:
MIT Stanford Berkeley Caltech
overall 1 2 2 4
aerospace 1 4 NA 5
biomedical 6 13 14 NA
chemical 1 4 2 6
civil 3 4 1 12
computer 1 2 4 10
electrical 1 3 2 7
environmental 5 1 2 9
industrial 12 6 5 NA
material 3 1 2 NA
mechanical 1 2 3 9
Physics NA NA 2 4 |
| |
08-18-2007, 09:46 PM
|
#20 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Threads: 13
Posts: 78
| Why is Caltech top 4 overall if the only subcategory it is actually top 4 in is Physics? I know it's probably some statistical anomaly but that doesn't seem right. I mean, their average position in the ones they actually rank in is 7.3, and they don't even rank in 3 of the categories.
Last edited by gobeavs : 08-18-2007 at 09:51 PM.
|
| |
08-19-2007, 12:14 AM
|
#21 | | Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Threads: 62
Posts: 829
| glad columbia and Rice moved up. |
| |
08-19-2007, 04:15 AM
|
#22 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 21
Posts: 9,321
| Quote: |
So UC-Berkeley is a better engineering school that Cal Tech? Really?
| Well the differences are quite small. But, basically, yeah, I would say that Berkeley is a slightly better engineering school than is Caltech. Keep in mind that Caltech freely admits that it is more of a pure science school than an engineering school.
But the rankings don't fully capture just how desirable a particular school is for a prospective student. For example, one of THE most annoying aspects of Berkeley is the notion of the impacted major: some majors, including ALL of the engineering majors, have fewer available spaces than there are interested students. If you go to Caltech intending to major in a science and then decide once you're there that you'd rather major in engineering instead, you just go right ahead and switch. Nobody is going to stop you. Not so at Berkeley. Plenty of Berkeley students who decide they want to switch into engineering are denied from doing so. The reverse is also true: if you are a Berkeley engineering student and you decide that you want to switch into something else, you may be prevented from doing so because the individual non-engineering colleges at Berkeley may decide that they don't want to take you. The same is true even if you want to switch from one engineering major to another. If you come in as a ME student and decide that you'd rather major in EECS, you have to apply to switch, and you may not be approved. Hence, plenty of Berkeley students end up in majors that they don't really want.
In fairness to Berkeley, it should be said that Berkeley is not the only school with impacted majors. Plenty of other schools have the same problem. But the key takeaway is that Caltech does not. As a Caltech student, you can choose any major you want and switch at any time.
Last edited by sakky : 08-19-2007 at 04:20 AM.
|
| |
08-19-2007, 12:05 PM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 164
Posts: 2,059
| Quote: |
Why is Caltech top 4 overall if the only subcategory it is actually top 4 in is Physics? I know it's probably some statistical anomaly but that doesn't seem right. I mean, their average position in the ones they actually rank in is 7.3, and they don't even rank in 3 of the categories.
| Because rankings are silly. |
| |
08-19-2007, 02:44 PM
|
#24 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NYC--PSU at UP
Threads: 121
Posts: 850
| Can anyone please post the entire list for undergraduate computer engineering/science (I was wondering where PSU was placed)?
Also, does anyone have a link to last year's ranking so we can compare to see which schools moved? |
| |
08-19-2007, 03:17 PM
|
#25 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Threads: 1
Posts: 340
| Quote: |
So UC-Berkeley is a better engineering school that Cal Tech? Really?
| The engineering ranking only looks at peer assessment, which Berkeley always scores high in. If you look at overall rankings, Berkeley's peer assessment is 4.8, but it's overall ranking is around 20 or so. If the overall rankings only use peer assessment like the engineering ranking, then Berkeley would be above Penn, Duke, Caltech, Columbia, Chicago, and almost every other school.
Berkeley's overall peer assessment beats Caltech's by an even greater margin than the engineering ranking, but Caltech has always ranked above Berkeley overall. The USNWR engineering ranking uses a methodology very favorable to Berkeley. It doesn't mean Berkeley engineering is better. |
| |
08-19-2007, 10:23 PM
|
#26 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Threads: 1
Posts: 85
| Yeah, the undergrad computer science list would be great. |
| |
08-20-2007, 07:43 AM
|
#27 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: NYC--PSU at UP
Threads: 121
Posts: 850
| or just the entire undergrad computer engineering... |
| |
08-20-2007, 10:27 AM
|
#28 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: New York City
Threads: 451
Posts: 3,051
| The undergraduate computer engineering ranking is up and sadly PSU isn't on the list.  |
| |
08-20-2007, 11:15 AM
|
#29 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Threads: 23
Posts: 72
| There's no undergraduate ranking for Computer Science.
The entire list for each specialty was posted, if it stopped at a certain number, that's because that's all there is to that particular ranking. |
| |
08-25-2007, 11:04 AM
|
#30 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Threads: 89
Posts: 944
| |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM. |