College Confidential
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

  College Confidential > Professional & Graduate School > Graduate School
New User

Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Join for FREE now, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one)!
Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! CampusVibe™
»Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Chances
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
SuperMatch - The Future of College Search!
CampusVibe - Almost As Good As A Campus Visit!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2012, 08:50 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
Physics graduate school choice help

Before I continue looking for advisors and subjects, I need to know where I might have a realistic shot at getting admitted into either a M.Sc. or a Ph.D. in physics. Note that I didn't write the GRE or the TOEFL just yet, and any budgeting decision will depend on what schools might be probables or possibles.

I'm well aware that PhDs in physics may not find employment doing jobs related to physics so I don't think that my dissertation subject would matter that much in the longer term.

Here are a few pieces of information that might be useful to review my request for information:

Current GPA:
- 3.67 if I apply to schools that count A+ as 4.3 (I have 14 credits' worth of A+s out of 68)
- 3.61 if I apply to schools that count A+ as 4 instead

Current school: University of Montreal
Current major: Double-major physics-mathematics

ECs: Wrote articles for the physics department's student newspaper

Even though the University of Montreal is a francophone school, I know some people in the graduating class that were admitted at schools like UBC, McGill and Waterloo for grad school, all of which are anglophone schools. Plus, like all Quebecer schools, regardless of teaching language, Quebecer resident students, like me, undertaking most undergraduate degrees only need 90 credits of coursework to graduate.

Plus, like most francophone schools that offer physics or mathematics as majors (usually with no selectivity other than what's afforded by the requirements of majors), University of Montreal is known to be a sieve-type of school, a school that admit lots of undergrads freshman year and weeding out the subprime students (usually between 1/3 and 1/2 of the incoming class).

P.S.: If I realize that what I want to do for my MSc (or PhD) was a topic related to solar physics or exoplanets, then I may as well stay at my undergraduate school since these are two things I know University of Montreal is renowned for in the physics world; as long as I can stay above 3.3 for the final 22-credit stretch I could classify that school, alongside University of Sherbrooke and Laval University, as grad-school safeties, since they both ask for a minimum GPA of 2.7.
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 09-15-2012, 11:10 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bloomington, Indiana (IU SPH MS, '13)
Posts: 2,864
None of us know what the right graduate school for you is, and there is no such thing as a "safety" - being above the minimum GPA is meaningless. Graduate admissions are highly holistic and qualitative.

You need to talk with your professors about the right programs for your particular research interests. Look at journal articles in your field and find faculty who are doing interesting research.

No Ph.D program is worth attending if they don't offer full funding.
polarscribe is offline   Reply   
Old 09-15-2012, 11:23 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
Perhaps there are some schools more appropriate for certain research topics and other schools for other topics. But my lack of knowledge about what's done at American universities in physics is not helping me the slightest.

But without any research experience, I'm disadvantaged.
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 09-16-2012, 12:03 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bloomington, Indiana (IU SPH MS, '13)
Posts: 2,864
You don't have any research experience? That's a big, and potentially killer, gap in your application - particularly if you want to go directly to a Ph.D. You need to work on that ASAP.
polarscribe is offline   Reply   
Old 09-16-2012, 10:42 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
Perhaps I'd be better off not going directly to Ph.D. instead... even then, my school has a yearly window for undergrads to gain research experience and, by the time I can seize that opportunity it might be a little too late.

Last edited by Catria; 09-16-2012 at 10:49 AM.
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 10-12-2012, 12:50 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
I wonder what schools I could cross off my list by now...
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 10-13-2012, 07:13 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 285
As someone who applied to mathematics and physics graduate schools (and am now pursuing a PhD in mathematical physics) it's pretty key to have /some/ research experience, just so schools know that you really want to pursue a PhD and know what it entails. If you don't know what schools have what kind fo research, just start googling the physics departments of different universities, and looking at their research page. You can also look up papers on your interest in the arxiv, and see where the authors/collaborators work.

If I were you, I'd probably do an MSci and get research experience before applying for a PhD.
Spriteling is offline   Reply   
Old 10-16-2012, 10:54 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
Then, what kind of schools can I cross off my list for a MSc?
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 10-17-2012, 12:24 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bloomington, Indiana (IU SPH MS, '13)
Posts: 2,864
This isn't the right way to do things. You don't start by "crossing schools off your list." You start by building a list of programs that fit your particular research interests.
polarscribe is offline   Reply   
Old 10-17-2012, 09:23 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
OK, then, I'd either want to do stellar physics or theoretical particle physics for a physics MSc, since my condensed matter desires would be better covered if I applied in a graduate, research-oriented materials engineering masters program.

With that information considered, am I in a position to get some school suggestions?
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 10-19-2012, 07:21 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
But perhaps McGill is not a "bad" choice by any means (subject pending); there's a professor at McGill that told me, via email, that I would be competitive for MSc admission there.
Catria is offline   Reply   
Old 10-20-2012, 02:27 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bloomington, Indiana (IU SPH MS, '13)
Posts: 2,864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catria
With that information considered, am I in a position to get some school suggestions?
No, because none of us know the right schools for you and this is the kind of research that you need to be doing as a prospective graduate student.

Look on department Web sites for information about their graduate programs and admissions requirements. Browse faculty listings for information about their research interests.
polarscribe is offline   Reply   
Old 10-20-2012, 09:43 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,741
At least my current four master's program choices are fully funded so that's not a problem.
Catria is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.




Copyright 2001-2011, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved