| | |  |
03-30-2007, 01:07 AM
|
#1 | | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2
| Why do you think I didnt get in? Valedictorian
Eagle Scout
Youth elder at my church
National Merit Scholar
Vice President of WHO (Tutoring Club)
National AP Scholar
-Bio - 4
-US Hist - 3
-Spanish Language - 3
-Chem - 5
-Calculus AB - 5
-Calculus BC - 5
-English Language - 5
-English Lit - 5
-Computer Science A - 5
-Government - 5
-Comparative Gov. - 5
-Macroeconomics - 5
2300 SATI (800 Math, 760 Writing, 740 CR)
800 Math II SATII
760 Chem SATII
And I play soccer for fun |
| |
04-26-2007, 07:54 PM
|
#2 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: California
Posts: 38
| Honestly its hard to say. Harvard is a really hard school to get into. Valedictorians with perfect SAT scores and lots of AP courses get rejected all the time. Don't feel bad, with your credentials I'm sure you got into plenty of great schools. |
| |
04-26-2007, 07:59 PM
|
#3 | | Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 348
| You have strong credentials, but they are not really that much unlike many others that apply to Harvard |
| |
04-26-2007, 09:54 PM
|
#4 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 2,563
| Your EC's don't stand out. |
| |
04-27-2007, 12:22 AM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Brookline, MA
Posts: 492
| Wow, MellowVids, you ask a difficult question. You should feel really proud about your high school accomplishments.
I will say, though, that Weasel8488 has a point: your APs stand out, but your ECs (and everything else) are pretty common among Harvard applicants. If I had seen your stats ahead of time, I would have said you were a slight reach because you have all your i's dotted and t's crossed but you weren't a standout.
The real question, though, is which great schools have you gotten into with your great stats? And what's your strategy for standing out when you get there, so that you have great opportunities after graduation? |
| |
06-01-2007, 02:15 AM
|
#6 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Purgatorio
Posts: 133
| Your stats sound like just about all of the 'smart' people at my high school.... none of whom were accepted into Harvard. You're a clone of thousands of other bright, moderately accomplished kids who haven't done anything truly remarkable with your lives before the age of eighteen. Shame on you all! |
| |
06-01-2007, 02:17 AM
|
#7 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Purgatorio
Posts: 133
| Now, if you were recruited to play soccer professionally before you graduated from high school, that would be something different. I could see an athletic scholarship in your future, if nothing else.
From what I've been able to learn, that's about the level of acheivement that you would have to muster. So your rejection shouldn't come as too much of a surprise.... |
| |
11-10-2007, 04:12 PM
|
#8 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 159
| your ecs don't stand out.. usually people that get in have interned at NASA or published their theories in philosopy |
| |
03-24-2008, 06:36 PM
|
#9 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 62
| that really surprises me, hes an eagle scout!! and with all those good grades. I wonder why you didnt get in, you should of played more sports, thats all i can say. |
| |
07-30-2008, 07:37 AM
|
#10 | | New Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13
| hmm...your EC part is very weak. Almost everyone who applies to Harvard has perfect or nearly perfect scores or grades in their academics part. Well when this happens, whoever has a more solid EC background would have a better edge.
good luck |
| |
08-20-2008, 12:28 AM
|
#11 | | New Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 11
| I think the only reason you didn't get in was because of your ECs. Your test scores are fantastic. It's just that your ECs are very one-sided. BTW, I am not saying that you need to be an intern at NASA. I am just saying that only 3 of you ECs (Vice President of WHO, Eagle Scout, and Youth elder) actually required time during the week. Also, your awards are very centered on academics. Elite colleges want to see more diversity, like good academics, with debate and starting a club. |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 PM. |