College Discussion

Go Back   College Discussion > College Admissions and Search > Ivy League > Harvard University
Register FAQ     Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Welcome to College Discussion at College Confidential, the Web's leading discussion forum for college admissions, financial aid, SAT prep, and much more! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, etc. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
   College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum. For those of you who wish more personal advising, College Confidential offers private counseling services, conducted via e-mail, with services starting at $89. Counseling is conducted by our Director of Counseling Dave Berry, co-author of America's Elite Colleges and/or with Sally Rubenstone, co-author of Panicked Parents Guide to College Admission, and our other outstanding associates. See College Counseling for more information.

This welcome message goes away when you register and log in!
Discussion Menu
Discussion Home
Help & Rules
Latest Posts
NEW! College Visits
NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
College Search
College Admissions
Financial Aid
SAT/ACT
Parents
Colleges
Ivy League
Main CC Site
College Confidential
College Search
College Admissions
College Counseling
Paying for College
Sponsors
 Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2008, 08:58 PM   #31
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Threads: 2
Posts: 18
I believe that is because many competing schools also increased their financial aid amount.
mom2319 is offline  
Old 05-08-2008, 09:02 PM   #32
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Threads: 11
Posts: 98
Also, I think a lot of kids are not afraid to turn down Harvard for a "lesser" school that they prefer ...
inthezone is offline  
Old 05-08-2008, 10:20 PM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY ---> Hahvahd, Cambridge, MA 2012
Gender: Male
Threads: 117
Posts: 1,624
Also, harvard eliminated SCEA, where its yield is around 90%. Perhaps SCEA + this initiative (or maybe if they had made the 120 - 180K percentage less than 10) would have driven the yield up into the high 80s...but this is really good news if you just look at their RA yield in past years being 70%.
piccolojunior is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 01:12 AM   #34
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: 47°18′8″N 122°12′53″W
Gender: Male
Threads: 72
Posts: 754
Is anyone surprised that Harvard's yield is actually lower than last year despite having record low admit rates and the best financial aid in the world?

A lot of people were predicting 90%...
friedrice is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:09 AM   #35
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kirkland House, Cambridge, MA
Threads: 6
Posts: 301
harvard yield around 78%

The Harvard Crimson :: News :: College Sees No Change in Admissions Yield
h-bomber is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:12 AM   #36
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kirkland House, Cambridge, MA
Threads: 6
Posts: 301
also, it says they're accepting 150-175 students off the waitlist this year!
Congrats guys!
h-bomber is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:22 AM   #37
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Harvard
Gender: Male
Threads: 20
Posts: 1,633
Well, it's not that much different - not much difference between 79% and 78.5%.
xjayz is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:00 AM   #38
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Threads: 14
Posts: 114
u guys have to remember that the reported 78 percent yield can only result when assuming that 100 percent of the 150 wailistees accept the offer. So at this point w/o the waitlists, the yield is around 75-76 percent. Well its still damn high tho haha
timeless is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:07 AM   #39
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Threads: 11
Posts: 123
It is very unlikely that 100 percent of the 150 waitlistees would accept the offer.
Ijmom is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:19 AM   #40
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Harvard
Gender: Male
Threads: 20
Posts: 1,633
timeless: I don't understand. Then the reported yield is meaningless if they were to extrapolate the data. Why 78.5%? In fact, why not just say 1%? The 78.5% is clearly based on the number of original admits who accepted the admissions offer.

Ijmom: I agree with you on that. It is very unlikely that 100% of WL admits will take up the offer, but I think the yield of WL admits will be higher, simply due to the fact that if you remained on the waitlist, it's probably because you wanted to attend Harvard if given the chance.
xjayz is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:25 AM   #41
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 84
Posts: 1,248
Very interesting. One of the few industries in which a glut of clients can pose a potential catastrophe, so the corporation is "breathing a sigh of relief" when a sufficient number of their potential customers decline! My D was accepted RD at both H and Y this year - one brief call and one letter from H during April, but calls, letters, e-mails, t-shirts every few days from Y. Clearly, H was concerned about too many students, Y was bracing for too few.
gadad is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:32 AM   #42
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 84
Posts: 1,248
Here's something that, if true, is fascinating about the H waitlist. I've read in the past on CC that the waitlisted students are not in any priority order; they're there to provide a pool of talent from which H admissions can draw to maintain the balance of skills in their handcrafted class. The next person who backs out doesn't open a spot for the "top" person on the waitlist. The loss of a soprano opens up a spot for a soprano, the loss of a debater makes them seek another debater, etc. Can anyone confirm that that's true?
gadad is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:34 AM   #43
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Threads: 3
Posts: 18
I don't know if that is necessary true. There are plenty of people who went onto the waitlist merely because it was a click away, literally. It was a means of keeping their options open in case they did have a change of heart. I'd say that most people who get off the waitlist would go, but there's a rather larger number who wouldn't merely because clicking "yes, i'll remain on the waitlist" isn't exactly the ultimate manifestation of desire.
wellnow is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 01:42 PM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 82
Posts: 3,144
^^ Having too few is a much easier problem to solve - just keeping pumping the handle on the the waitlist well until you've got what you want. Having too many will create problems that will last all year. And having WAY too many will put the school in a world of hurt.
coureur is offline  
Old 05-09-2008, 02:30 PM   #45
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Threads: 53
Posts: 810
gadad,

I posted previously this comment. My son is a new admit and his very good friend is on the waitlist for Harvard. I was doing some searching for him trying to find out what the waitlist was all about at H, because schools do it differently (according to a Stanford adcom). I googled lots of different titles into the search heading and found an article from H that stated this. Maybe it was an old crimson issue. I'm not sure. I will try to find it again and post where I found it.

Best of luck to those waiting
guitars101 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Copyright 2001-2008, CollegeConfidential.com, Inc., All Rights Reserved
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0