from sxc its just me.........i dont know why the guys didn't apply to WUStL!!!!????
and oh......eat this too....<b>this one is also fun</b>
Maybe I was a little too harsh on MIT. Nevertheless what you say is true. I don't hate MIT as an institution and its people; in fact, I am still in love with it. I just HATE the f***ing admission process and that the admission rate is so LOW. How can they pick 12% of students from 70% that are qualified to be at MIT? I guess that everyone here didn't have the lucky ticket. I bet they created some program on the computer that gave everyone of the 70% who were qualified a number. I guess that everyone here just didn't win the 1000 grand prizes they were handing out. Oh, well. There is another day.
Oh yeah...I came up with this the other day...here it goes...
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Ed No. M 08-8522 JSW
Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION
TO ATTEND MIT
MIT
Defendants.
___________________/
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ motion to attend MIT. Having considered Plaintiffs’ pleadings, the relevant legal authority,
and the record in this case, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for to attend MIT,
DISSOLVES any possiblity of attending MIT,
and sets the hearing and briefing schedule on the pending motions.
BACKGROUND
On March 15, 2008, Plaintiffs Ed (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action alleging causes of action for unlawful and unfair
practices in violation of fair selection to attend MIT,
declaratory relief, interference with contract, interference with prospective economic advantage,
conversion, and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs allege that MIT has unlawfully and wrongfully declined a very large number of good students that fit MIT.
CONCLUSION
For the above reasons, the Court DISSOLVES any possibility of attending MIT. In addition, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to attend MIT, and the Court DENIES the Plaintiff's motion for rejected students to be reinstated. Lastly, the Court addresses the remaining interested and amicus curiae parties. All pending motions to dismiss or to intervene
and any further motions to dismiss shall be heard on Friday, May 16, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. Any
motion not already filed shall be filed no later than March 30, 2008. Any opposition to any
pending motion shall be filed no later than April 10, 2008. Any reply brief shall be filed no
later than April 16, 2008. This schedule supercedes all previous orders or stipulations approved by the Court. If the Court determines that any matter is suitable for resolution without oral
argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court’s consideration a stipulation and proposed
order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 16, 2008
HONORABLE JUDGE MIT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
check this out for some more.....i really enjoyed reading this blog!!!!
MIT Admissions | Blog Entry: "Not Admitted"
College Confidential is dedicated to providing the best free college admissions information available on the Web, through our many articles and this discussion forum.
..
