College Confidential
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

  College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Parents Forum > Parent Cafe > Parent Cafe - Election and Politics
New User

Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Join for FREE now, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one)!
Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! CampusVibe™
»Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Chances
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
SuperMatch - The Future of College Search!
CampusVibe - Almost As Good As A Campus Visit!
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2008, 01:23 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,661
Obama chooses Volcker for economic position

Volcker Tapped for Advisory Role - WSJ.com

I am happy to see this.


"President-elect Barack Obama will appoint former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker on Wednesday to be the chairman of a new White House advisory board tasked with helping to lift the nation from recession and stabilize financial markets, Democratic officials say.

University of Chicago economist Austan Goolsbee, one of Mr. Obama's longest-serving policy advisers, will serve as the board's staff director, along with his duties as a member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Members of the panel will be drawn from a cross-section of citizens outside the government, chosen for their independence and nonpartisanship.

The board's mission won't be to supplant the policy-making role of the Treasury Department and other agencies, but to give Mr. Obama an official forum for getting expert advice outside the normal bureaucratic channels. It will give briefings to the president.

The panel, called the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, is modeled on the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board established by then-President Dwight Eisenhower in 1956, at the height of the Cold War, when officials worried that that the existing bureaucratic structure was inadequate to help the U.S. keep pace with the Soviet threat. The financial crisis has drawn similar worries that the government isn't properly organized to monitor and respond to modern financial markets.


President-elect Obama will appoint Paul Volcker to head an advisory board.
For the third straight day, Mr. Obama plans to make what he calls a major economic announcement, dominating the policy news during Thanksgiving week and trying to fill a policy vacuum that has left the nation's financial markets in an uneasy swoon.

The board's tasks will be broad: to help design and implement short-term programs to jump-start the economy, raise wages and living standards and confront the housing crisis. It will also address the delicate task of bolstering Washington's oversight of the financial markets in the wake of a Wall Street collapse that has taken down many of its most venerable institutions.

Obama advisers have pledged a streamlined but tougher regulatory regime that would force more transparency onto hedge funds and private-equity firms, while regulating the trading of exotic instruments such as credit default swaps that helped precipitate the current crisis.

After his election, Mr. Obama was reluctant to assert too much authority on the economy before his inauguration, worried that he would be blamed for the crisis before he had the power to resolve it, Obama aides have said. But with markets remaining fragile, the Obama team decided it couldn't wait until the Jan. 20 swearing in to begin acting to offer some reassuring clarity about who will manage economic policy next year.

On Monday, Mr. Obama introduced the central figures of his economic team, Treasury Secretary-nominee Timothy Geithner, National Economic Council director Lawrence Summers, and Christina Romer, who will be chair of his Council of Economic Advisers. On Tuesday, he pledged long-term fiscal restraint while standing next to his budget director, Peter Orszag.

Wednesday's event was more of a surprise, but with it, Mr. Obama has found a place for the former Fed chairman who is largely credited with halting inflation in the early 1980s. Since the financial crisis erupted in September, Mr. Obama has leaned heavily on the 81-year-old Mr. Volcker for advice.

Mr. Volcker may serve another purpose, said Martin Baily, a former Council of Economic Advisers chairman under President Clinton. He will be a counterweight to Mr. Summers, who may dominate policy making from his perch inside the White House."
dstark is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 08:30 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 236
Me, too. Volcker has long spoken out about the dangers of deregulation and the excesses of our financial system. I can't help but wonder if things might have been different today if Volcker had remained at the Fed. It's painful to read these words from a 1987 NYT article announcing Reagan's selection of Greenspan as new Federal Reserve chief:

Quote:
The main philosophical difference between Mr. Volcker, a Democrat, and Mr. Greenspan, a Republican, appears to be in their views of the structure and regulation of the banking system. Mr. Volcker has tended to resist deregulation of banks while Mr. Greenspan is more favorably disposed to it.

VOLCKER OUT AFTER 8 YEARS AS FEDERAL RESERVE CHIEF; REAGAN CHOOSES GREENSPAN - New York Times
mapesy is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 08:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,661
There is no doubt in my mind that things would be very different today if Greeenspan hadn't replaced Volcker.

One of the bigger blunders.
dstark is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 08:57 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,960
The seeds for the financial downfall began with Greenspan. I don't know if Volcker can even clean up a mess this big, but we can always hope.
-Allmusic- is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 09:21 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,792
I am a bit confused about the role of all these economic advisors: Summers, Romer and now Volcker. Can someone tell me what is the specific role of each? Thanks!
The one thing I do know is none of these folks are "laissez-faire" personalities.
marite is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 09:35 AM   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
What I like most about Volcker is his independence. He was willing to defy both the Carter & Reagan administrations in his desire to break the inflationary cycle from 1979 through 1982. He's a fortunate economist, I suppose, to be given the chance to do battle against such major macro evils: inflation, financial panic, and unemployment.

And I couldn't help but smile when I heard Christina Romer's name--an economic historian appointed chair of the CEA! Economic history, viewed by many in the profession as its red-headed stepchild. Maybe the flow of mathematicians, physicists, and engineers entering the field will slow just a little?
europa is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 09:59 AM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West
Posts: 515
In the 70s, Volcker destroyed the economy to save the economy. I am not sure we need his expertise from the 70s today.

The economy is not in trouble for lack of regulation. Our economy is in trouble because the democrats in congress forced lenders to lend to people who could not repay their debts and Greenspan mismanaged interest rate reductions and increases.
razorsharp is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 10:26 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,960
RS, it really is time to give your partisan nonsense a rest. This is so much bigger than Freddie and Fannie. You can thank all your deregulators, the bankers and fund managers who have gotten unconscionably rich, knowing they were playing with funny money. We have had Republicans in charge for eight years, and they have driven us out to sea with no lifeboat.

Read Tom Friedman today. He outlines our problems very well.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/op...ml?ref=opinion
-Allmusic- is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 10:41 AM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West
Posts: 515
Quote:
RS, it really is time to give your partisan nonsense a rest.
Oh geez., Allmusic, you are the most left wing partisan person on this board. You can't see the world without it being an emotional left wing wonderland. If the clock on the wall is one minute inaccurate, you would blame president bush. If you want partisan nonsense look in the mirror or read your own posts.

My comment about Volcker was about his behavior. He sent the economy into recession in the carter years to kill inflation. It worked, but the pain was incredible and (if you want to add politics to the subject) it resulted in carter not being re-elected. In other words, volclker hurt democrats yet I don't particularly care for him. And since we do not have an inflationary spiral today, his skills are not necessary.
razorsharp is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 12:18 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,960
Did you read Tom Friedman?

I didn't think so.
-Allmusic- is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 12:32 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 236
Even better than Friedman's piece is the essay he cites: "The End" by Michael Lewis. It's a must read for those who want to understand what went wrong on Wall Street. You'll be surprised, amazed, and disgusted.

The End of Wall Street's Boom - National Business News - Portfolio.com
mapesy is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 12:41 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West
Posts: 515
Quote:
I didn't think so.
As usual you are wrong. I read the link you provided before I posted the above. Friedman gave a quick summary and decided to blame everyone. There is plenty of blame to go around but the absence of regulation is not one of them. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not created by the free market. They were created by the government. They only exist because the government regulated them into existence. The loans they were forced to accept was dictated by democrats trying to give loans to their special interests and enacting legislation to force bad loans. In other words more regulation.

Possibly the biggest problem Friedman missed was to omit discussion of how Greenspan mismanaged interest rates over his term. He was a horrible fed chief and probably as bad a Volcker was.

At leaset Friedman was honest and blamed that idiot Rubin who got $25 million per year from citi as a consultant while consulting citi into the ground. I hope shareholders find someway to sue Rubin. He is a crook.
razorsharp is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 12:44 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,661
Volcker was the best fed chief in my lifetime.

I think republicans even like him .

I'd like to read negative comments about Volcker.

Razorsharp, do you have any links?
dstark is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 01:03 PM   #14
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West
Posts: 515
Quote:
I think republicans even like him
Republicans loved him because he raised interest rates so high it destroyed Carter's economy and resulted in the election of Reagan.

Quote:
I'd like to read negative comments about Volcker.
There aren't many. That's the problem. The media has fond memories of him now but fail to remember the pain he caused when he engaged in overkill.


Quote:
Razorsharp, do you have any links?
Here is one from the Daily kook. Daily Kos: State of the Nation

Please tell me how raising interest rates so high and causing a double dip recession somehow makes you a great fed chairman. Volcker engaged in overkill and he hurt many people who never recovered even though others benefited later. Even liberal economist lester thurow will tell you that it is not inflation that is the problem, but changes in increase in inflation that is the problem.

Our current economic crisis is not caused by inflation. It does not need volcker's extreme measures.

After Obama implements his nutty stimulus plan, however, he will cause inflation like no one has ever seen and then volcker will be needed. But that won't be for a few years.
razorsharp is offline   Reply   
Old 11-26-2008, 01:07 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,661
Volcker killed inflation. Why do you think he can't handle other issues?

I don't follow that logic.

The Daily Kos is a republican blog? lol I know. I didn't ask for negative comments from republicans.

You know... I feel good about the appointment. I'm not going to get into an argument about Volcker today.

Have a great day razorsharp.
dstark is offline   Reply   
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 AM.




Copyright 2001-2011, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved