College Confidential

Go Back   College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Parents Forum > Parent Cafe
New User

Welcome to College Confidential, the leading college-bound community on the Web!
 
Here you'll find hundreds of pages of articles about choosing a college, getting into the college you want, how to pay for it, and much more. You'll also find the Web's busiest discussion community related to college admissions, and our College Visits section!

You are currently viewing the site as a guest.
Registration is simple and easy, and provides full site access.

Join our FREE community:

  • Post and reply to topics
  • Talk privately with other members
  • Participate in polls
  • View less ads
  • Remove this welcome message

 REGISTER NOW

Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! College Visits
»NEW! Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-09-2007, 01:25 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,978
boy we have short memories

If someone is a risk to others and indicates that in their writings- is" free speech" of the individual, more important than the safety of the group?

Apparently some feel it is.
emeraldkity4 is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 05:02 AM   #17
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 625
Quote:
Would you favor similar laws in the U.S.?
No. Rather than prosecute her, I would surveil her (so to speak.)
lskinner is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 08:42 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,224
My libertarian sympathies are always strained by cases like this. This woman wrote a "poem" detailing the best method by which to saw off the head of a living human being.

So many other things to get exercised about, so many other people to be concerned about.
midmo is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 09:12 AM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 336
I've seen double standards before, but emeraldkity's observation should strike home to some of the other posters on this thread.

This is what police and surveillance are for. Its too bad they didn't wait to see who else they could round up in her network of fellow travelers.
dadx is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 10:23 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 2,329
emeraldkity is correct.
simba is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 07:09 PM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 124
The Brits should begin deportation, not prosecution. That's only way to deal with this threat from within.

Imagine if she's convicted it will just reaffirm the martyr complex in her and so many jihadists. She will take her quoran to jail and read it day and night and find more hatred and cause for violence. You can't keep her in jail long because she hasn't done it YET. And she just wait for the day she's released to fullfill her mission, commit mass murders. No prosecution. Deportation.
edvest1 is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 07:22 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego area
Posts: 2,674
Wouldn't deportation just allow her to commit her mass murders sooner?
ucsd_ucla_dad is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 09:04 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 6,978
where are they going to deport her too?
Wasn't she born in the UK?
emeraldkity4 is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 10:52 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,184
how to saw off a head...well....so what!!! seriouslly people, it was writing, when writing become illegal we have lost already to the terrorist- so much for the reason we are fighting them, eh> to protect democracy

we have literature about poisening people, we have books on rape, bank robberies, who decides what is a threat?

let say someone writes a poem about nailing someone to some wood and letting them bleed to death in public in order to stop him because they saw him as a threat

so she wrote a bad poem....scary to me that some would jail people for what they write

where do you draw the line>
citygirlsmom is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 10:57 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Diego area
Posts: 2,674
cgm - Did you read the whole article? There's more to it than writing a poem. There's also a good chance there's more to it than was in the article.
ucsd_ucla_dad is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 11:00 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,184
even agatha christie talks about how to kill people in her writing

guess we should just stop spy thriller writing because, gee, they talk about all sorts of "threatening" stuff

I am watching the movie Blow and we learn all about how to smuggle drugs, should those writers be jailed?

What is it about Beheading that freaks so many out? Because we saw it?

It is just amazing how frightened we have become of words....tell me, what did she really do besides have some reading material, talk big, and write some tacky poetry?

When we through people in jail for thinking, we are no better than those we fear
citygirlsmom is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 11:05 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,184
Yes I read the whole article= they claim she tried to give some money and had some manuals...and she was convicted on ONE charge if I am correct

Why are people so afraid of words...maybe all the rappers that write about killing cops should also go to jail for their lyrics
citygirlsmom is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 11:12 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,184
some words to ponderL

Benjamin Franklin: Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

If the First Amendment means anything, it means that a state has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his house, what books he may read or what films he may watch.
Thurgood Marshall

When you can be arrested for what your write and read, that is what the founding fathers feared- that is why is the 1st amendment- not the last
citygirlsmom is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 11:25 PM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 143
"She will take her quoran to jail and read it day and night and find more hatred and cause for violence."

THIS just crossed the line.
As a Muslim student in the United States, I cannot tolerate that statement at all.

Do you realize that you are taking the holy book of the world's 2nd-largest and fastest-growing religion and basically wittling it down to a manual of "hatred"?

I agree that the Brits are more "liberal" than us Americans but much, much less tolerant to foreigners. If you ever happen to visit London (or practically any modern Euro. city for that matter) you will realize that blocks of the city are split into ethinic neighborhoods. In the USA, the furthest "ethnic" neighborhoods reach are black or hispanic-dominated streets. That's it.

As a politically moderate Muslim-American, I have to say that I would fear the woman. Airport background checks apparently are not strong enough, or perhaps she was employed before she started becoming interested in all this jihad.

I'm not a lawyer nor do I have a clue about the judicial system, so really I have no opinion about whether she should be in jail or not.

What SHOULD be done, however, is to figure out how the youngest adults of every Westernized society are becoming more influenced by these extremists! And I'm not just speaking about Islamic extremists! Extremism can be drugs, alcohol, suicide...Religion doesn't necessarily have to have the most influence on their lives. They are, after all, young adults.

But seriously, the Qur'an comment crossed the line. I'm not going to even start lecturing on that. I'm surprised no one else has stood up against it. There are so many BAD BAD BAD translations of the Qur'an which may make phrases seem full of hate, but essentially it is the philosophy of Islam. And as risky as it may seem to say this in the 21st century, Islam is NOT a religion of hate.
beirut08 is offline   Reply   
Old 11-09-2007, 11:33 PM   #30
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 124
from Citygirlsmom
Quote:
seriouslly people, it was [only] writing...so she wrote a bad poem...where do you draw the line
You would probably say what's the harm ,it's only an animal when young Jeffrey Dahmer skinned a cat.

Where do I draw the line. I draw the line based on preponderance of facts that most terrorist acts are carried out today by islamic extremists, and they invariably started out by swearing to wage jihad against infidels, and these people actually carry out their threats.

You liberals live in a cocoon. All that idealistic rants about defending democracy is warrant for self destruction and blind to the increasing danger we face. Furthermore liberals make the real citizens who care for our country and are on the front line fight 2 wars. One against people from outside who seek to exterminate civilization, one to fight the lame-brain leftists from within.


Quote:
Wouldn't deportation just allow her to commit her mass murders sooner?
Dont understand. She's incarcerated now. Deportation will send her out from jail to goodbye Great Britain. Since she's so fond of Osama why not send her to like some no man's land in between Sunnies and the Shiites, and she can decide which to join.
edvest1 is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 AM.


Copyright 2001-2009, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved