Wow. I just signed on for the first time since last night, and I see there've been quite a few responses.
First of all, pafather, please don't be so obnoxious and offensive. I'm quite genuine, and so is my son! What do you want, identification? And what do you mean, he "says" he's gay??
What's this business lately where anytime someone doubts what someone says, they come on and essentially accuse them of being a liar or a troll? Other than trying to be a smartass, I'm not sure what's accomplished.
Also, I'm not by any means discounting the potential safety issues; that's why I began the thread! And I think a lot of the advice has been wonderful, and I do plan to check out all the links. But insofar as my son's intentions go, where does all this nonsense about encouraging "sexual escapades" and "cruising for men" stuff come in? I didn't say anything remotely suggesting that that's what he wanted to do, and neither did my son to me. And, no, I'm not "encouraging" anything like that.
He wants to find a place where he can hang out for a couple of hours and watch other gay guys, and maybe have some wine, and maybe do some dancing. Something he loves to do, but, guess what, despite all the dancing he did at the prom this year and at the "project graduation" parties,
he's never danced with another boy in his life!
And he already told me he wants to find someplace where there's a young crowd. He has no interest whatsoever in older guys, fortunately -- college boys seem to be his preferred demographic -- and wouldn't want to end up in a bar full of 45-year old leather guys any more than I'd want him there.
Obviously, a lot of research is necessary.
(Which reminds me a little of the first time I let him walk around Greenwich Village by himself at all, two years ago when I was at a fundraiser for something downtown and I gave him exactly an hour to take a walk -- he was back at the appointed time, and told me he'd walked up and down Christopher Street, and I asked him how he liked it, and he said it was fine, except he was disappointed that everyone there was so old. Old, I said? Yes, he said -- most of them were at least 30! He wasn't joking.)
And, believe it or not, he happens to have very strong feelings about not wanting to have sex with anyone he's not in love with.
So, I think calling PFLAG and doing the equivalent of staging an intervention is a bit premature, perhaps.
If I can figure out a way he can do anything like this safely (and the Gay Village idea sounds fantastic), then, you know what? I think it would be great.
Sometimes I think people can be a little oblivious to how hard, how lonely, and how alienating it is to grow up in an overwhelmingly heterocentric world, where straight people already have 98% of the cultural pie (and there are some who aggressively seek 100%!). The world of a small, affluent North Jersey suburb, once a Republican town but a place where most people vote Democratic now, a place where my son faced no open hostility despite starting to come out to people at school as gay six years ago, when he was 12. But still a place where he was one of only three "out" gay kids in his class even by the time he was a senior, and one of only a handful in his whole school -- every single one of them, I think, associated in some way with the Drama Club! A place with nobody to be "interested" in, once he realized years ago that getting crushes on straight boys was a self-destructive thing to do. A place where every little first step of heterosexual teenage romance receives cultural approbation, applause, and encouragement -- first date, first kiss, first dance, how cute, how lovely! But where the idea of two high school boys interested in each other would be viscerally upsetting to most parents.
A place where all his close friends have been girls (because for years, boys were afraid to be seen as his friends), who confide in him all the time about their romances and loves and boyfriends, and he listens, and gives support, and never has anything of his own. Never kissed anyone, never held hands with anyone, never taken a walk with someone he likes.
Is he less deserving than they are? I don't think so. I still remember a few years ago, when he was 14 or 15 and I asked him what he wanted for Hanukkah, and he said, "can you get me a boyfriend?" Of course he was joking, but there was an undercurrent of sadness, and, yes, it made me sad.
So I think Consolation was entirely right to point out the following:
Quote:
The thing that's missing from the analogies to the 18-yr-old girl going out to meet men is that this kid is gay. !8-yr-old girls have been able to date and conduct a social life comfortably and with full societal approval--including that of their peers in HS--for years. That is very likely not true for a gay teen.
So it is understandable that the idea of this kind of freedom has gone to his head a bit.
|
Exactly. So when he came up with this brainstorm over the weekend, and came to me excitedly with it, and I immediately shot it down, and got all "upset semi-hysterical parent" about it, well, I have to admit I'm not surprised he got his back up and reacted like he did. It's not that unusual an initial reaction for a teenager who makes plans he thinks are amazing and spectacular and is immediately told no. Even an 18-year old. And it isn't like he hasn't threatened to disobey me before. But he never actually has, not with anything major.
I've discussed this with him since only once, and only briefly. He was already in "negotiation mode": well, instead of *every* night during the two weeks we're there, how about one to three times? I was very noncommittal, but it's a step in the right direction!
I'm not letting him go anywhere unless I've checked it out first myself on another night, to see what the place looks like, what the neighborhood looks like, and how safe the transportation is. And unless he agrees to follow each and every rule I set down, even if it means calling me every 15 minutes! And anything else I can think of.
Really, I'm less worried about his safety *inside* whatever place he may go to -- because I *do* trust him in that sense, and do trust him not to leave a bar with a stranger -- than about getting home safely, getting lost, getting his pocket picked or being mugged. That kind of thing.
But it wouldn't surprise me if, in the end, he's way too tired at night, by the time we've finished what we're doing during the day, and have had dinner, to want to do anything like this after all. No matter how ambitious he is now. On every vacation I've ever been on with him in the last half-dozen years -- London/Bath, Boston, Washington, San Francisco, etc. -- he's run me ragged, insisting on seeing every gallery in every museum, every church, every interesting neighborhood, every everything. By day's end, both of us are usually too exhausted to do anything but sleep! (I should post the day-by-day itinerary he's already typed up for the trip to Rome, based on the Blue Guide and the Access Rome guide -- it's about six single-spaced typed pages!)
So maybe this will all turn out to be academic. I kind of hope so. But if there is some way to do something like this safely, and he does do it once or twice over the course of two weeks, please don't think I'm going to feel abandoned or disrespected. True, I won't be able to sleep till he gets back, but being by myself for a few hours a couple of times wouldn't exactly be a tragedy.
For all I know, he'll realize how unbelievably boring it is to be in a club full of strangers, unable to speak the language, and come back early! (Although, after all, there are plenty of Italians who speak English, and my son also speaks Spanish close to fluently -- he visited Mexico City last summer, and was able to communicate with people very easily.)
Look at it this way. In a couple of months, I'm going to trust him to be on his own in the South Side of Chicago. Where do you think the crime rate is higher -- there, or the tourist areas of Rome?
So, yes, I'm worried. Yes, a lot more research needs to be done, and every possible precaution needs to be taken.
But I think some people here have been getting a little carried away with the condemnations, both of me and of my son.
Thanks again to the many of you who've been so helpful.
Donna