College Confidential
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

  College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Parents Forum
New User

Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Join for FREE now, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one)!
Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! CampusVibe™
»Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Chances
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
SuperMatch - The Future of College Search!
CampusVibe - Almost As Good As A Campus Visit!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-06-2012, 08:38 PM   #211
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Xiggilandia where the ale trumps Westvleteren
Posts: 14,835
I do get the same link by typing SAT Test Dates 2012

SAT Test - SAT Dates and Deadlines.

However, google seems to rearrange the results of searches based on prior searches. You also might try SAT Test Dates 2012 2013 and see if that comes up.
xiggi is offline   Reply   
Old 06-06-2012, 09:02 PM   #212
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Xiggilandia where the ale trumps Westvleteren
Posts: 14,835
Quote:
Most students take the SAT during the spring of their junior year of high school. Many students choose to take the SAT a second time in the fall of their senior year after becoming familiar with the test day experience.
The College Board has its shares of inconsistencies. On the one hand, they insist that preparing for the test should not increase one's score by more than 30 or 60 points (probably changed a bit since the days of the 1600 SAT) and that such increase might be accounted by "aging" a bit and be more familiar with the test. And yet, they do sell an online "prep" package and have "offered" it to residents of states such as Georgia and New York. Do we really believe they sold the "package" to the officials by saying ... "Look this ain't working too well, but you should buy it for the kids?"

However, back to the discussion of my recommendation --which is NOT based on taking the tests in 9th grade. What I have recommended is to start in the summer between the sophomore and junior year with the objective of sitting for the PSAT and SAT at the same time. The reason is that the PSAT might be important for certain students who have the potential to score high. Fwiw, some students might have started a slow preparation after receiving the scores of a practice PSAT taken in 10th grade. But again, the summer before the Junior year is ideal as one can devote more time than during school and should not have the pressure of the "last" summer before senior year.

The benefit should be to have the preparation bringing up the PSAT score as opposed to take it ... just to see what happens. After receiving the scores of the PSAT and SAT scores, one might continue the preparation for the January administration or even a later date. If all fails, there is always the summer before senior year and the October senior year session.

If I might repeat what I wrote before, the idea is to follow a slow and consistent approach as opposed to intense cram sessions. With the bonus of plenty of time and low pressures, one can see a consistent increase in comfort with the ways of TCB. A longer period of preparation also allows for checking the latest discussions on the test and keep the information fresh.

And, fwiw, this does not require taking 35 to 50 past tests and learning silly lists of 3500 words. We are talking about 2-3 sections a week, including some with open books and WITH the answers.

Again, there are no "best" approaches, as the testers are individuals with a wide range of prior preparation. I do, however, like what I advocate because it is extremely low cost, low pressure, and that it ... has worked rather well for more than a few students. And, if I am wrong, there is always Princeton Review to take a few thousand dollars from your wallet, and send a stressed out student to take the latest test possible.
xiggi is offline   Reply   
Old 06-06-2012, 09:02 PM   #213
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,278
You can find the Fig-orithm here: ( just in case you thought I made it up )

SAT dates

The dates from the formula aren't always correct, but it is correct almost all the time. (For 2012 it worked for 6 out of the 7 dates).

Anyway, I admit it would be nice if the CB could put the anticipated fall dates up earlier than May.
fignewton is offline   Reply   
Old 06-06-2012, 10:28 PM   #214
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hilbert space
Posts: 3,370
For parents who took the SAT themselves, here is my time-saving competitor to the xiggi method of test prep:

1) Look up the renormed version of your own scores and your spouse's scores.
2) If you took the writing test when it was an SAT II, add that in. Otherwise, multiply your old test scores by 1.5.
3) Average the results for yourself and your spouse.
4) Is the average good enough for your son or daughter's target school? In that case, no prep is needed.

For parents who did not take the SAT, but whose son or daughter took the PSAT as a sophomore:

1) Multiply the PSAT score by 10.
2) Is the result good enough? Then no prep is needed.

This eliminates the tedium of the slow-and-steady preparation method, leaving more time for things that are worthwhile (or even for staying up till 2 am working on school work that is not really worthwhile). Thought that some of the posters on this particular thread might be a receptive audience.
QuantMech is online now   Reply   
Old 06-06-2012, 10:31 PM   #215
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,729
Oh, my kids can thank their lucky starts that they did better -- soooo much better -- than I did on the SAT. I took the SAT during Homecoming weekend and had more important things on my mind!

ETA: My kids did a modified xiggi and did really well. At least I think it's a modified xiggi. I got tired of reading that outrageously long thread (not xiggi's fault) and so kind of winged it based on what I'd read up to that point. I'm a former marathon runner so could appreciate the idea of mixing up the kinds of effort needed to achieve your goals (some work timed, some not, some open book, etc).
Youdon'tsay is offline   Reply   
Old 06-06-2012, 10:33 PM   #216
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hilbert space
Posts: 3,370
Okay, let me revise that to suggest that parents start from the SAT scores they *should* have received (thus eliminating the interfering effects of homecoming, etc.)

I will throw in the added thought that it is worthwhile for students to learn which of the rules of grammar CB insists upon, and which it regards as "more what you'd call guidelines than actual rules" [Ref: Jack Sparrow] for the writing test. They seem to be fairly strict about parallelism, to the point of favoring slightly awkward constructions over shorter ones that are still pretty clear. Your kids may have their own personal "bug-a-boos."

I do think test prep may be worthwhile for students who had weak math programs in their high schools or who forget math quickly. Test prep also tends to be worthwhile for first-generation Americans, if they have not fully acculturated. Inapplicable assumptions, based on one's own culture, can interfere with performance on the CR part of the test. In these cases, xiggi's method may suffice, or it might even be worthwhile for the student to take a prep course.

Last edited by QuantMech; 06-06-2012 at 10:46 PM.
QuantMech is online now   Reply   
Old 06-09-2012, 01:05 PM   #217
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 283
This is what happens when you let a profit-minded institution like Collegeboard decide the futures of college-bound children. Their first priority is money, and how to make it.
danishpastry123 is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 PM.




Copyright 2001-2011, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved