| | |  | |
03-13-2008, 04:26 PM
|
#1 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New England
Posts: 1,579
| Pricey summer programs raise fairness questions
From the Globe West section of today's Boston Globe:
"...For a fee, students can travel to such places as Ireland, Nepal, or Senegal. And they can immerse themselves in a foreign language, dive into community service, or explore their adventurous side by surfing or rock climbing.
Such programs have multiplied in recent years, giving students who can afford them amazing new opportunities - and perhaps additional pressures during what could be a season for lazy days at the beach and minimum-wage jobs.
But, as the college-admissions process becomes ever more competitive, another question about such programs emerges. Alongside high-priced application coaches and test-prep services, does a summer experience that costs anywhere from $2,000 to $8,000 represent yet another way that wealthier students can gain an edge over their lower-income peers?" Pricey summer programs raise fairness questions - The Boston Globe |
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 04:34 PM
|
#2 | | Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 491
|
Depends, but it certainly doesn't hurt an application and decent international experience is becoming more and more important to remain completive at the top levels of many careers.
I would just say that one needs to be careful when looking at these programs as many are not nearly as prestigious as they claim and offer little of value academic wise.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 04:36 PM
|
#3 | | Member
Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: PA
Posts: 319
|
And as we all know...life isn't fair. This will just widen the gap.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 04:39 PM
|
#4 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 882
|
Yes, it gives those with the more money an advantage to the extent that colleges consider those experiences in the application process. However, I think most Ad Coms are evaluating students on the basis of whether or not they make the most of what is available relative to their individual circumstances, not whether or not their parents could afford to send them around the globe.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 04:49 PM
|
#5 | | Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 752
|
More hype from the press catering to admissions paranoia. Does anyone really believe that at the schools where such things matter that the admissions officers are that stupid?
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:02 PM
|
#6 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: suburb of buffalo
Posts: 4,171
|
Have you ever listened to friends recount their travel abroad? Some make astute observations and derive personal meaning from their encounters. Others merely recite every place they ate and slept (yawn).
Some people derive deep meaning from ordinary experiences, while others
can respond so flatly to extraordinary opportunities they're meaningless.
I would trust AdComs who read tons of these essays throughout a season to figure out the differences, and which kind of student they prefer.
Meanwhile, my own 3 did just fine writing about some normal, middle-class,
summer jobs and family moves. Through those experiences, they demonstrated some core values, their personalities, their curiosity.
Of all the imbalances and injustices regarding class opportunities for kids, somehow this one doesn't worry me because I actually trust the filter of the AdComs to find those kids who have meaningful experiences wherEVER they roam.
I think it might unnerve or discourage some very poor kids who imagine they have nothing to offer by comparison to fancy experiences abroad, when that's not true at all.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:11 PM
|
#7 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,358
|
agree with paying3. My d HAS traveled a lot, both on family trips, and school group/service type things. However, her "backyard" experiences were the topics of her essays. I think international travel helped her see her own city, its people, and how she relates to them in new ways, but those trips were not the subject she chose to write about.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:13 PM
|
#8 | | Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 928
|
paying3tuitions
That was excellent. Thank you.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:25 PM
|
#9 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,422
|
OP -- adcoms are made up of sophisticated adults acutely attuned to what kids do and they are under no illusions. They take these pay-a-ton-of-money-volunteer-trips for what they are: interesting opportunities for kids of relative privlidge. A kid naive enough to think it's a hook is a kid who probably will not pose much of a threat to worthy applicants |
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:32 PM
|
#10 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: suburb of buffalo
Posts: 4,171
|
It could become code for a kid who won't be applying for any need-based financial aid, but there are other ways AdComs can intuit this, for example: address, absence of any paid employment, parents' occupations.
Besides, every college needs some full payers or the place will tank. I'm not naive, just idealistic.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:37 PM
|
#11 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,058
|
Totally agree with Paying3's first post. As for the later one, I'm not so sure that it matters. We were full pay, initially, and we had none of that code stuff to prove it (public school, no pricey summer trips, etc). Kids did just fine in admissions.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 05:50 PM
|
#12 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 5,477
|
I think this has become a little industry that no longer serves the function it is marketing. When Yale got one or two applications a year from kids who had worked in clinics in West Africa, that probably had a lot of impact for them. When it gets hundreds of applications from kids who have gone on the same programs with what are essentially commercial tour operators, not only does that scream "Buying my way in!", but it probably raises the bar considerably for a kid to show he got something out of it that none of the other hundreds of kids did.
My relatives' anecdotal experience reflects this. A cousin's son was in the top half of his top boarding school class, had an interesting background (born and educated in Europe, in local schools, through age 12), and one of these nifty programs for a summer of service in an exotic locale. He had disappointment after disappointment on the admissions front, including at the college that his grandfather (who is semi-famous) and father attended. (He got in off the waitlist to a college he loves, but it isn't what his family was expecting when they packed him off for his international service.)
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 08:25 PM
|
#13 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 15,286
|
Those pricey programs do NOT help students get into college except for the colleges for which being a full pay student is an advantage.
Otherwise, participating in such programs may hurt a student because the colleges that factor ECs into admission would be more impressed by a student who worked an ordinary job or created a community service project in their school or hometown. Doing such things typically reflects more initiative, resourcefulness and work ethic than participating in a pricey EC paid for by well off parents.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 08:30 PM
|
#14 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,746
|
A Chicago admissions counselor when asked about summer ECs said we prefer a statement like, "I sat under a tree last summer and read 10 books." Admission Counselors know what is going on.
|
| Reply
|
03-13-2008, 08:31 PM
|
#15 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,000
|
What do college admissions officers look at first when they see an application? I hardly think that the fact that a kid that spent a summer in a pricey program jumps out at college admissions. My guess is the first thing they look at are test scores, then grades. Where it breaks down after that probably depends on the college.
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM. |