| | |  | |
05-09-2008, 02:12 PM
|
#16 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 358
Posts: 6,457
| Bragging rights? Quote: |
Anyone wants to speculate on why HYPC UPENN all have to use the waitlist while Brown and Dartmouth are over-enrolled.
| For some, you need to look at the changes in their early decision policies; for others, it had to be a desire to remain competitive in the arm's race of posting the lowest admission number possible.
The fact that Penn and Yale have to dig deep in a WL pool is quite different from the situation at Harvard and Princeton. |
| |
05-09-2008, 03:14 PM
|
#17 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Threads: 26
Posts: 727
| ^ Xiggi - please elaborate. Curious here. |
| |
05-09-2008, 03:15 PM
|
#18 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Threads: 95
Posts: 2,868
| Don't know quite how accurate it is , but it has been reported on the UChicago board that the University will not be taking anyone from there waitlist, though they will keep a shortlist for the summer. My guess this is in anticipation for any melt-off due to some acceptees being taken off WLs elsewhere. |
| |
05-09-2008, 05:52 PM
|
#19 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Threads: 95
Posts: 2,868
| In an apparent contradiction to the initial posting, someone just posted that did indeed get in off of the wait list at Chicago. |
| |
05-09-2008, 07:41 PM
|
#20 | | Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 16
Posts: 409
| See this link for acceptance rates of the last three years at certain schools: Ivy League Admission Statistics for Class of 2012
Overall, the schools profiled admitted slightly more students this year than last.
Last edited by ohmadre : 05-09-2008 at 07:51 PM.
|
| |
05-09-2008, 08:01 PM
|
#21 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: USA
Threads: 132
Posts: 6,551
| Quote: |
In an apparent contradiction to the initial posting, someone just posted that did indeed get in off of the wait list at Chicago.
| Not surprising. I have found that statements made to school newspapers and the like don't always match reality.
I admissions, "the class is full" does not mean "we aren't going to the waitlist". Heck, "we aren't going to the waitlist" doesn't necessarily mean "we aren't going to the waitlist"....
For one thing, these schools often go to the waitlist early in April for specific reasons. If they find out their top left-handed Tibetian oboe player is going to Harvard, they'll immediately go to the waitlist to snag their #2 left-handed Tibetian oboe player.
The only thing you can really do is wait 'til the common data sets come out and see what the real numbers are! |
| |
05-10-2008, 12:02 PM
|
#22 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Threads: 0
Posts: 35
| I KNEW I should have pushed the Oboe playing thing. My left handed kid would be IN! Those left handed oboe players have all the luck.
Actually, I hear this year all the top schools are looking for six foot tall sword-eaters who speak Tagalog. Serious lack of those kids; recruited heavily. |
| |
05-10-2008, 12:38 PM
|
#23 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Threads: 95
Posts: 2,868
| robileez: Too bad S is already in college, he is 6 foot, and he does eat small swords, he can bend a 7 ft spear with the point against his throat and the staff-end on the floor, and he speaks passable Tagalog. There is always someone who has the "hook." |
| |
05-10-2008, 12:43 PM
|
#24 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Threads: 95
Posts: 2,868
| From the UChicago admissions blog, about as equivocal as one can get: Quote: |
Yes, we've accepted a very small handful of people from the waiting list. Yes, we may be accepting a few more. We don't know how many more. We don't know when--maybe as late as June or July. We've heard that a number of other schools are going to their waiting list in a big way, and are anticipating that they might be taking a lot of our committed students. We will communicate with everyone on the waiting list in the next few weeks about their status, which may either be "keep waiting, we may need you over the summer," or "stop waiting, we don't think we need you." There won't be a mass "stop waiting, you're in" at this point.
| |
| |
05-10-2008, 01:11 PM
|
#25 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT
Threads: 47
Posts: 1,352
| This is all so interesting. When I graduated from HS -- in 1966; yes, that's 1966; no typo there -- one of my friends was waitlisted at Columbia. He didn't hear until August that he got in, and then he had only about two weeks until he had to be there.
In those days I don't think the schools "used" their WLs to manage yield; I think my friend just benefited from someone else's bad luck and inability to attend for whatever reason. |
| |
05-10-2008, 02:41 PM
|
#26 | | New Member
Join Date: May 2008
Threads: 1
Posts: 10
| Re posts 16 and 17. Here is why Harvard is digging so deep into its WL pool. It's part of a two-part PR maneuver. First, Harvard under-admitted by a wide margin, allowing it to lay claim to the lowest acceptance rate ever. Then, to make up the shortfall, it will accept 150-175 off the waitlist -- and it gets to claim a 100% yield for waitlisted acceptees. (That does ultimately raise the percentage admitted, but only after the initial 7.1% acceptance rate has been shouted from the rooftops.) It’s brilliant. H gets to claim the lowest acceptance rate AND the highest yield, both of them artificially induced. |
| |
05-10-2008, 06:34 PM
|
#27 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Threads: 358
Posts: 6,457
| How low does one need to go? ^^--^^
The theory might be correct, but I think you have the wrong party. Harvard does not need to play the PR game and their reasons to restrict admission to the low percentage were all legitimate.
As far as claiming the lowest percentage, they could have added more than 200 admissions to their tally and STILL remain below 8% and below all their close competitors. Further they could have added 100 students (and stay below 7.5% rate) and simply take 50 transfers ... if those numbers were critical. And as a long term policy, they might start playing the "college segregating game" that is played around Morningside Heights.
If you look for gamesmanship, move your radar in the direction of New Haven and Philly where schools maintained an early admission policy. I am sure than admission rates and yield seem more important at a school that admitted close to 900 student in December and just over 1000 in the Spring. |
| |
05-10-2008, 06:44 PM
|
#28 | | Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Threads: 15
Posts: 300
| ^
xiggi- Penn has ED, Yale has SCEA, which is non-binding, right? How does that game the yield, if students aren't locked in by ED?
still trying to grasp all of this, so pardon my ignorance, if this is obvious. |
| |
05-10-2008, 06:52 PM
|
#29 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: USA
Threads: 132
Posts: 6,551
| Quote: |
Yale has SCEA, which is non-binding, right? How does that game the yield, if students aren't locked in by ED?
| A Yale SCEA admit might keep a very highly qualified applicant from even applying to other schools... schools that might, ultimately, tempt the student to reconsider her love for Yale. |
| |
05-10-2008, 07:05 PM
|
#30 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Threads: 57
Posts: 3,297
| "A Yale SCEA admit might keep a very highly qualified applicant from even applying to other schools.."
Not "might." Usually does. One of the huge reasons for an EA app is to limit the length of one's college list. Worked for my D. Shortened her list to a total of 5.
(it works basically like a rolling admissions school, the difference being in this case a reach category, vs. the usual safety category of rolling admissions.) |
| | All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM. |