College Confidential
» CC HOME » FORUM HOME

  College Confidential > College Admissions and Search > Ivy League > Princeton University
New User

Welcome to College Confidential!
The leading college-bound community on the web
Join for FREE now, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community polls, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one)!
Discussion Menu
»Discussion Home
»Help & Rules
»Latest Posts
»NEW! CampusVibe™
»Stats Profiles
Top Forums
»College Chances
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Financial Aid
»SAT/ACT
»Parents
»Colleges
»Ivy League
Main CC Site
»College Confidential
»College Search
»College Admissions
»Paying for College
Sponsors
SuperMatch - The Future of College Search!
CampusVibe - Almost As Good As A Campus Visit!
Princeton University
1 Nassau Hall
Princeton, New Jersey 08544-0070
School Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-23-2012, 10:08 PM   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 14
Acceptances with non-remarkable stats.....

Let's generate some hope.....

Any non-jaw-dropping candidates who managed to snare an acceptance, please post your relatively non-stellar stats and give the 2170, 3.9ish, non-cancer-curing types some reason to throw their hat in the ring. And please, no URMs.... Congratz and wonderful for you that you get to jump the cue, but not really relevant to this thread and would only confuse what might be possible for non-URMs.
Homeschoolq is offline   Reply   
Old 09-23-2012, 10:59 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,778
I find your remark about URMs jumping the cue insulting.
perazziman is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2012, 12:05 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 533
You should probably look through the old acceptance stats threads:

Official Princeton University Class of 2016 Results

Official Princeton University Class of 2015 RD Results Thread
mrscollege is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2012, 06:40 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 865
Character is something that will get a candidate noticed and it is also something that comes through in essays and recs, just as I got a sense of your character from your post and agree completely with perazziman.

If I'm wrong, I'm sorry, and you need to be careful about how you present yourself.
lefthandofdog is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2012, 10:19 AM   #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1
delete this.
Jhomer is offline   Reply   
Old 09-24-2012, 01:35 PM   #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22
The tone of your post is inappropriate.

That said, I recommend you check the common data set as that will give you a range of test scores
jreeder64 is online now   Reply   
Old 09-24-2012, 03:59 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 87
Not to mention the inability to distinguish between "cue" and "queue."
EastCoastGirl715 is offline   Reply   
Old 09-25-2012, 09:24 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Silicon Valley, California
Posts: 2,820
Homeschoolq, I am guessing from your screen name that you may be homeschooled. You should expect that test scores and other objective data about your educational accomplishments will be more important for you than for a student with a traditional transcript.
siliconvalleymom is offline   Reply   
Old 09-25-2012, 09:58 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Princeton '16
Posts: 223
As a URM student at Princeton, I can honestly say that your original post is not only in bad taste, but an indicator of the kinds of things you may say in day-to-day conversation and therefore a reason that admissions might choose to not bring you to Princeton.

And as an answer to your question, yes - there are plenty of people who's stats and scores are not stellar, but because (regardless of ethnicity) their personalities would contribute to the Princeton community. Thus, ^ isn't working in your favor.
alexcuad is offline   Reply   
Old 09-25-2012, 10:06 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,031
Even thinking some kids jump the queue shows limited (read: crippling) understanding of the admissions process. This is not all about stats, not about picking kids from 2400 on down. The kids fortunate to get admitted to top schools are, by and large, very worthy.
lookingforward is offline   Reply   
Old 09-25-2012, 03:23 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,778
Hi alexcuad, could you please read my thread titled Straight to the dustbin... and share your honest opinion? I would appreciate it. Thanks.
perazziman is offline   Reply   
Old 09-26-2012, 05:30 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 31
Bad taste OP
BigG9695 is offline   Reply   
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 PM.




Copyright 2001-2011, Hobsons, Inc., All Rights Reserved