Welcome to College Confidential!

The leading college-bound community on the web

Sign Up For Free

Join for FREE, and start talking with other members, weighing in on community discussions, and more.

Also, by registering and logging in you'll see fewer ads and pesky welcome messages (like this one!)

As a CC member, you can:

  • Reply to threads, and start your own.
  • Post reviews of your campus visits.
  • Find hundreds of pages of informative articles.
  • Search from over 3 million scholarships.
Please take a moment to read our updated TOS, Privacy Policy, and Forum Rules.

Zinhead Senior Member

2,727 Points 5,347 Visits 2,473 Posts
Last Active:
Registered User
  • Re: "Race" in College Applications FAQ & Discussion 12

    Inside HigherEd published an opinion piece by Roger Clegg called "Why Racial Preferences Remain Wrongheaded" today:


  • Re: ***2018 National Merit Finalist Thread****

    I am sure you have heard, but USC is a weird duck in this regard. They have a generous NMF award, but ... I know specifically a few NMF last year that applied and were not accepted to the school period. They have SO MANY applications there, its an interesting scenario.

    USC has a hard cap on number of NMF scholarships. In order not to exceed that cap, they routinely deny NMF's even though they would otherwise have the stats and grades to be accepted.
  • Re: Is woman in STEM really a hook when applying colleges?

    One can easily find out the gender ratios at engineering schools at the ASEE site.

  • Re: 2018 US News Best Colleges rankings have been released

    Michigan has to be hurt by the fact that public ed in that state has been in free fall, with student scores falling for years. That is the pool for 1/2 of their freshmen. It can't be good.

    As shown by the following table, Michigan's school age population is in a long-term decline:


    Currently, Michigan's cohort of 18 year old's is roughly 133,000 kids. That is projected to fall to the 115,000 range in the next 15 to 20 years. They will need significant amounts of immigration to offset that figure, but they could always import more students from OOS.
  • Bourgeois Culture

    A few weeks ago, a law professor at Penn co-wrote with a law professor at the University of San Diego an op-ed in the Philly Inquirer entitled "Paying the Price for Breakdown of the Country's Bourgeois Culture"


    in which was stated:
    That culture laid out the script we all were supposed to follow: Get married before you have children and strive to stay married for their sake. Get the education you need for gainful employment, work hard, and avoid idleness. Go the extra mile for your employer or client. Be a patriot, ready to serve the country. Be neighborly, civic-minded, and charitable. Avoid coarse language in public. Be respectful of authority. Eschew substance abuse and crime.

    This editorial raised a firestorm of criticism, such as the following:

    We call for the University of Pennsylvania administration — Penn President Gutmann and the deans of each school — as well as faculty to directly confront Wax and Alexander’s op-ed as racist and white supremacist discourse and to push for an investigation into Wax’s advocacy for white supremacy. We believe that such statements should point directly to the historical and sociopolitical antecedents of Wax’s hate speech, and to disallow hate speech whether shrouded in respectability or not.

    Which brought some other discussions regarding the decline of academic free speech here:

    But to connect what Amy Wax wrote with the hate on display in Charlottesville -- as some of her critics have done -- is reprehensible, too. It turns white supremacy into a rhetorical weapon, which you can turn against anyone or anything that angers, offends or repels you. And it creates a culture of fear, which is anathema to the free exchange of ideas. You can't make things right when everyone is looking over their shoulder, wondering if they said the wrong thing.

    and here:

    I think it is important for the academic community to reflect on this case. In the wake of Charlottesville, all of us on campus might encounter passions among our students beyond even what we saw in the previous academic year, a year in which violence and the justification of violence became more common on campus. This year, we are likely to find many more professors accused of “white supremacy.” Professors and administrators may face many more campaigns designed to get them to sign open letters and collectively denounce colleagues. It is important, therefore, that we think about this case carefully and draw the right lessons. When and why should professors come together to denounce and condemn other professors? Of course we are always free to dispute each other; Wax’s colleagues could certainly have written essays or a collective essay debating her claims and pointing out flaws in her reasoning, but when is it morally and professionally appropriate to issue a collective public condemnation of a colleague?