College Confidential’s “Dean,” Sally Rubenstone, put together 25 of her best tips. So far, the "25 Tips from the Dean" eBook has helped more than 10K students choose a college, get in, and pay for it. Get your free copy: http://goo.gl/9zDJTM
That really depends on what you liked about it. If it's proximity to politics and location, American and GW are similar. If you're looking at campus size or program, it can differ pretty drastically. You'll have to be more specific.
Definitely American and GW then. American has a more similar campus, but both of them have excellent International Relations programs. You can also look at Tufts, which has a really good IR program too. Georgetown's SFS is unique, but you can find pretty good substitutes.
@piuounnnnn I suppose you can classify me as one of those applicants who, on paper, "deserved to get in". I was waitlisted RD and eventually rejected, but let me tell you why I applied to UChicago in the first place. Unlike some other schools, I got the feeling fairly early that UChicago was a place where they really cared about the applicant beyond the grade. I know most schools are holistic, but UChicago seemed like they REALLY cared about an applicant's other aspects. So the only thing I can conclude from this is that if they took you, something about your application must have stood out to them. Adcoms don't make very many mistakes. If they accepted you, it means they thought you had something they were looking for, even if your grades were below their average.
Test was not bad at all. MC was surprisingly fair considering some of the past MC questions are outright ridiculous. Thank you college board for giving us easy FRQs too. I'm just glad I didn't get the double feminism prompt that last year's euro students got... European feminism is much harder to write about in my opinion since it's so spread out across different countries.