| | |
03-28-2012, 01:41 AM
|
#31 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 95
|
Don't see how having photos is a big deal. I'm an international student, and our TOEFL score reports require a photo.
|
| Reply
|
03-28-2012, 01:59 AM
|
#32 | | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
|
Does this occur for SAT Subject Tests as well?
|
| Reply
|
03-28-2012, 06:01 AM
|
#33 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 46
|
What is "standby registration?"
|
| Reply
|
03-28-2012, 10:47 AM
|
#35 | | New Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 27
|
Nice.
And a better anticheating action is NOT TO REPEAT OLD QUESTIONS. Or answers can still be BOUGHT in advance, as 2011.6, 10, 11 and so on HK tests, enabling unprepared students earn 2250+ easily.
|
| Reply
|
03-28-2012, 12:13 PM
|
#36 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 111
|
For those who are concerned with the possibility of their photo being attached to their scores going to colleges, the NY Times article referenced earlier specifically says that this policy may be reconsidered. Nothing is set in stone; they are just trying to come up with steps to keep the identity fraud from happening.
I do not understand why some think this new change would still encourage students to switch tests who are in the same room. Why in the world would I want to switch with someone else if we are both taking the same exam? If both of us are equally intelligent, wouldn't the scores still be the same (or similar) to what I would have earned on my own? If one is more intelligent than the other, the scores would reflect this, so what is the purpose?
|
| Reply
|
03-28-2012, 12:22 PM
|
#37 | | Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: MN
Posts: 15,960
|
It sounds like these measures make it harder for students who have graduated from high school and matriculated at a college not to be tracked when they take the SAT, which MIGHT be to gain transfer to a new college, but is usually to take the test for someone else as a "ringer" or to harvest test items for a test-prep course.
|
| Reply
|
03-28-2012, 01:27 PM
|
#38 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 176
|
is this geared to that certain student that wants to go to that certain university, that will do most anything to get in? I just don't see that happening for state u. So, maybe the likihood of those individuals seeking admissions to those select college should just receive more attention and review.
|
| Reply
|
03-29-2012, 01:02 PM
|
#39 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Philly region
Posts: 1,809
|
I'm an adult. In our area, both back in my day & for my son, the proctors were ALWAYS very aware & very strict.
As far as photo ID -- My son had a letter form High School with photo and school seal on it to take the SAT because he has no other id.
I take many tests for my industry at "testing centers." I think moving forward, SAT/ACT should just go the way of Promatic Testing centers/CPA exams/etc where finger printing is required. Maybe by the time my youngest is taking the SAT it will just be an eye retina scan.
The thing is, cheaters will always find a way around the system.
|
| Reply
|
03-29-2012, 01:55 PM
|
#40 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 43
|
No, there are tests (I think the GRE and MCAT) where it is impossible to cheat. If ETS/ACT spent more money and time on security measures, none of this would even be an issue
Why would someone be upset with a college being able to see what you look like? Are you guys ugly or something?
|
| Reply
|
03-29-2012, 03:13 PM
|
#41 | | Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 340
|
I've got a great idea. Scrap these high priced ordeals that only benefit the College Board and ACT who basically own me, based on how many thousands of dollars I have shelled out for them. They are biased assessments that favor privileged kids. It is a total racket. Period.
|
| Reply
|
04-01-2012, 12:20 PM
|
#42 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 42
|
I'm happy that they're at least moving in the right direction. I know someone personally who cheated on the ACT--her score jumped 8-10 points (if not more) the second time and for some reason, no one seemed to find this suspicious enough to look into.
I don't think cheating can ever be 100% prevented but it can be continually discouraged and made more difficult.
|
| Reply
|
04-01-2012, 03:40 PM
|
#43 | | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,270
|
I fail to see why they don't adopt the LSAT precautions:
(1) Photo
(2) Government ID
(3) Fingerprints taken on test day and when you take the bar - if they don't match, you don't practice.
Though in the case of undergraduate students, your fingerprints are taken when you apply to graduate. Different prints = degree rescinded.
|
| Reply
|
04-01-2012, 04:12 PM
|
#44 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 55
|
This seems to be in direct retaliation to the kid from my school getting caught cheating on the SAT. He was really good at taking the SAT so he figured he'd offer to take it for other people. They would print off a fake ID with his picture on it. He eventually started charging $2,000 for his services plus the cost of a roundtrip flight from his college after he graduated. By the time he was caught he had taken the test for 17 different people, including females. At least by sending the photo to the highschool they would ideally catch the differences for some of these students, so I do think it does an ok job at fixing this. Not ideal, but it can't be
|
| Reply
|
04-04-2012, 08:25 AM
|
#45 | | Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 103
| homeschoolers
I'm trying to figure out how this works for homeschoolers. If the high school has the id..we are the high school. So will you upload a picture when you register for the exam itself? He has always had to show id at his testing center. Also, does this mean there will be a picture on the actual SAT or ACT score report?
|
| Reply
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM. |